ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Demoralization syndrome in elderly patients with advanced lung cancer: a multi-center study in North China.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Young Women With Pancreatic Cancer: A High-Risk Group for Demoralization.Psycho-oncology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a risk prediction model for demoralization syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes.Frontiers in public health · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This observational study sought to explore the prevalence and determinants of demoralization syndrome (DS) among elderly patients in North China diagnosed with advanced lung cancer (ALC), with the primary goal of mitigating their psychological distress. Methods: A convenience sampling approach was employed to recruit 420 ALC patients aged 60 years or older from four tertiary hospitals in North China. Data collection was carried out using structured questionnaires, which included the Chinese adaptation of the Demoralization Syndrome Scale and Perceptions of Social Support Questionnaire. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 26.0 software to derive meaningful insights. Results: Univariate analysis identified several significant factors influencing DS levels, including gender, smoking, average monthly household income, living alone, stage of cancer, social support, and self-management abilities. The mean DS score was notably elevated, with 32.8% of participants scoring within the high DS range. Multivariable linear regression analysis further established gender, average monthly household income, stage of cancer, social support, and self-management abilities as independent predictors of DS severity. Conclusion: The findings highlight the critical importance of addressing socioeconomic factors such as household income, strengthening social support networks, improving self-management skills, and implementing targeted interventions for female patients to reduce DS levels and alleviate psychological distress in elderly ALC patients, particularly those with stage IV cancer. These insights provide valuable guidance for healthcare professionals aiming to enhance the overall well-being of this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.