Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40708998›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Environmental enrichment for laboratory rats and mice: endocrine, physiological, and behavioral benefits of meeting rodents' biological needs.

Adriana Domínguez-Oliva, Ismael Hernández-Avalos, Antonio Bueno-Nava, Cuauhtémoc Chávez, Antonio Verduzco-Mendoza, Adriana Olmos-Hernández, Dina Villanueva-García, Alberto Avila-Luna, Patricia Mora-Medina, Julio Martínez-Burnes and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Adriana Domínguez-OlivaPrograma de Doctorado en Ciencias Biológicas y de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Mexico City, Mexico.
Ismael Hernández-AvalosFacultad Estudios Superiores Cuautitlán, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), FESC, Cuautitlán, Mexico.
Antonio Bueno-NavaDivision of Neurociences, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación-Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra (INR-LGII), Mexico City, Mexico.
Cuauhtémoc ChávezDepartamento de Ciencias Ambientales, CBS Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Lerma, Lerma de Villada, Mexico.
Antonio Verduzco-MendozaDepartment Bioterio and Experimental Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación-Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra (INR-LGII), Mexico City, Mexico.
Adriana Olmos-HernándezDepartment Bioterio and Experimental Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación-Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra (INR-LGII), Mexico City, Mexico.
Dina Villanueva-GarcíaDivision of Neonatology, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Mexico City, Mexico.
Alberto Avila-LunaDivision of Neurociences, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación-Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra (INR-LGII), Mexico City, Mexico.
Patricia Mora-MedinaFacultad Estudios Superiores Cuautitlán, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), FESC, Cuautitlán, Mexico.
Julio Martínez-BurnesFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Instituto de Ecología Aplicada, Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Ciudad Victoria, Mexico.
Arturo Gálvez-RosasDivision of Neurociences, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación-Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra (INR-LGII), Mexico City, Mexico.
Daniel Mota-RojasNeurophysiology, Behaviour and Animal Welfare Assessment, DPAA, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Mexico City, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standard housing for laboratory rodents is characterized by cages that do not always provide an adequate environment to meet the animal's behavioral needs. When animals are reared under impoverished conditions, negative states such as boredom and distress might arise. Environmental enrichment (EE) is an alternative to expose rodents to physical, sensory, cognitive, and/or social stimulation greater than the one received under standard housing conditions. The present review aims to discuss the main physiological, endocrine, and behavioral effects of environmental enrichment in murine research models. The positive and negative effects will be addressed, as well as factors including enrichment-related (i.e., type of EE, duration of EE) and animal-related aspects (i.e., strain, sex, or age) that need to be considered by researchers when adopting EE for laboratory rodents. It was observed that EE decreases corticosterone concentrations in rodents, an indication of lower levels of stress. Likewise, tachycardia, hypertension, and shorter heart rate variability are ameliorated with the implementation of EE (reflecting a beneficial effect). Among the behavioral benefits, rodents reared under EE have anti-anxiety characteristics, increased exploratory behavior, and less fear-related responses than standard-housed animals. However, in some cases, increased aggression has been reported. Although there is no standardization for EE, to properly adopt EE in experimental facilities, researchers must consider enrichment- and animal-related factors to improve the welfare of laboratory rodents.

Indexed as

animal welfaredistresshusbandrylaboratory animalsmurinephysiological traits

Identifiers

PMID40708998
PMCPMC12287651

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.