ReviewFrontiers in public health2025
Research progress and implications of the application of large language model in shared decision-making in China's healthcare field.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tuning and clinical application of large language models in Traditional Chinese Medicine: scoping review.Chinese medicine · 2026Review
- AI-Driven Medical Device Risk Management: A New Paradigm Integrating Large Language Models and Prompt Engineering for Standard-Risk Knowledge Graph Construction and Application.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- The Enduring Promise of Personalising Patient Preference Prediction.Neuroethics · 2026Review
- Proposing a novel ABCDEF framework for managing critical illness in geriatrics: challenges and perspectives.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Neurosurgical nurses' perspectives of patient-reported outcomes: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Shared Decision Making (SDM), as a modern medical decision-making model emphasizing patient participation, faces multidimensional challenges in China, including uneven distribution of medical resources, knowledge gaps, and inadequate cultural adaptation. The implementation of SDM in China is hindered by time constraints, insufficient patient willingness to participate, a lack of standardized decision support tools, and structural barriers such as healthcare reimbursement systems. Large Language Models (LLMs), with their powerful natural language processing capabilities, demonstrate unique advantages in enhancing communication efficiency, supporting personalized decision-making, and promoting multi-party collaboration. Key functionalities such as information integration, personalized support tools, and sentiment analysis significantly improve patient engagement and decision quality. However, LLMs still face limitations in localization, decision-chain completeness, and handling complex scenarios, particularly in understanding traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) knowledge and supporting family-oriented decision-making models. Future efforts should focus on constructing integrated knowledge graphs of biomedicine and Traditional Chinese Medicine, optimizing multi-layered expression capabilities, and improving model interpretability to promote LLMs' in-depth application in SDM within China, ultimately enhancing healthcare quality and patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.