Evidence mapPaperPMID 40709042Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2025

Research progress and implications of the application of large language model in shared decision-making in China's healthcare field.

Xuejing Li, Sihan Chen, Meiqi Meng, Ziyan Wang, Hongzhan Jiang, Yufang Hao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xuejing Li *School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Sihan Chen *School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Meiqi MengSchool of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Ziyan WangSchool of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Hongzhan JiangSchool of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Yufang HaoSchool of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shared Decision Making (SDM), as a modern medical decision-making model emphasizing patient participation, faces multidimensional challenges in China, including uneven distribution of medical resources, knowledge gaps, and inadequate cultural adaptation. The implementation of SDM in China is hindered by time constraints, insufficient patient willingness to participate, a lack of standardized decision support tools, and structural barriers such as healthcare reimbursement systems. Large Language Models (LLMs), with their powerful natural language processing capabilities, demonstrate unique advantages in enhancing communication efficiency, supporting personalized decision-making, and promoting multi-party collaboration. Key functionalities such as information integration, personalized support tools, and sentiment analysis significantly improve patient engagement and decision quality. However, LLMs still face limitations in localization, decision-chain completeness, and handling complex scenarios, particularly in understanding traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) knowledge and supporting family-oriented decision-making models. Future efforts should focus on constructing integrated knowledge graphs of biomedicine and Traditional Chinese Medicine, optimizing multi-layered expression capabilities, and improving model interpretability to promote LLMs' in-depth application in SDM within China, ultimately enhancing healthcare quality and patient satisfaction.

Indexed as

Decision MakingDecision Making, SharedDelivery of Health CareLanguageNatural Language ProcessingPatient ParticipationChinaHumansLarge Language ModelsMedicine, Chinese Traditionaldecision supportknowledge localizationlarge language modelsreviewshared decision making

Identifiers

PMID40709042
PMCPMC12287014

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.