ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in COVID-19-positive acute coronary syndrome patients: a retrospective study in Vietnam.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has disrupted the management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), with emerging evidence suggesting increased complications and mortality among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, data from low- and middle-income settings such as Vietnam remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of ACS patients with COVID-19 undergoing PCI at a tertiary hospital in Vietnam. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Ho Chi Minh City from 2019 to 2022. Adult patients diagnosed with ACS who underwent PCI were included and stratified by COVID-19 status confirmed via RT-PCR. All patients received standard guideline-directed therapy, including dual antiplatelet and anticoagulant regimens, and were followed for 1 year to assess clinical outcomes. Result: A total of 118 patients were included, comprising 26 COVID-19-positive and 92 COVID-19-negative individuals. Baseline characteristics and cardiovascular risk factors were generally comparable between the two groups. While procedural success rates were similar, COVID-19-positive patients demonstrated higher thrombus burden and significantly increased rates of ICU admission, prolonged hospitalization, and MACCE at all timepoints. COVID-19 severity, cardiogenic shock, and multivessel disease emerged as independent predictors of adverse outcomes. Conclusion: In this Vietnamese cohort, COVID-19 infection was associated with worse clinical outcomes following PCI for ACS. These findings highlight the need for early risk stratification and resource planning during pandemic conditions. However, the small sample size, single-center design, and observational nature of the study limit its generalizability, and causal inferences should be drawn with caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.