ArticleBiosensors2025
ENaC Biomarker Detection in Platelets Using a Lateral Flow Immunoassay: A Clinical Validation Study.
Article in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Arterial hypertension (HTN) is a growing global health concern, with limited tools available for early detection. Previous studies identified the overexpression of the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) as a potential biomarker for HTN. In this work, we optimized and clinically validated a lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) using gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) functionalized with anti-ENaC antibodies. The test strips were prepared with 10 µL of each component and performed in a 9-point herringbone format. For validation, a double-blind study was conducted using platelet lysates from 200 individuals, classified based on real-time blood pressure measurements. ENaC expression was assessed via both LFIA and Western blotting, which served as the reference method. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis yielded an AUC of 0.7314 for LFIA and 0.6491 for the Western blot, with LFIA demonstrating higher sensitivity (76.24%) and comparable specificity (61.54%) compared to the Western blot (68.31% and 60.34%, respectively). These results support LFIA as a practical, rapid, and moderately accurate tool for screening ENaC levels and identifying individuals at risk of hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.