ArticleBiosensors2025
Salivary Biosensing Opportunities for Predicting Cognitive and Physical Human Performance.
Article in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Circulating Biomarkers of Military-Specific Performance Resilience: A Systematic Review.Current psychiatry reports · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advancements in biosensing technologies have introduced opportunities for non-invasive, real-time monitoring of salivary biomarkers, enabling progress in fields ranging from personalized medicine to public health. Identifying and prioritizing the most critical analytes to measure in saliva is essential for estimating physiological status and forecasting performance in applied contexts. This study examined the value of 12 salivary analytes, including hormones, metabolites, and enzymes, for predicting cognitive and physical performance outcomes in military personnel (N = 115) engaged in stressful laboratory and field tasks. We calculated a series of features to quantify time-series analyte data and applied multiple regression techniques, including Elastic Net, Partial Least Squares, and Random Forest regression, to evaluate their predictive utility for five outcomes of interest: the ability to move, shoot, communicate, navigate, and sustain performance under stress. Predictive performance was poor across all models, with R-squared values near zero and limited evidence that salivary analytes provided stable or meaningful performance predictions. While certain features (e.g., post-peak slopes and variance metrics) appeared more frequently than others, no individual analyte emerged as a reliable predictor. These results suggest that salivary biomarkers alone are unlikely to provide robust insights into cognitive and physical performance outcomes. Future research may benefit from combining salivary and other biosensor data with contextual variables to improve predictive accuracy in real-world settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.