ReviewBiosensors2025
The Role of Nanomaterials in the Wearable Electrochemical Glucose Biosensors for Diabetes Management.
Review in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- TiOMicromachines · 2025Review
- Nanostructured Materials in Glucose Biosensing: From Fundamentals to Smart Healthcare Applications.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Sweat, tears, and beyond: advanced wearable sensors for personalized health and athletic performance.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing prevalence of diabetes mellitus necessitates the development of advanced glucose-monitoring systems that are non-invasive, reliable, and capable of real-time analysis. Wearable electrochemical biosensors have emerged as promising tools for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), particularly through sweat-based platforms. This review highlights recent advancements in enzymatic and non-enzymatic wearable biosensors, with a specific focus on the pivotal role of nanomaterials in enhancing sensor performance. In enzymatic sensors, nanomaterials serve as high-surface-area supports for glucose oxidase (GOx) immobilization and facilitate direct electron transfer (DET), thereby improving sensitivity, selectivity, and miniaturization. Meanwhile, non-enzymatic sensors leverage metal and metal oxide nanostructures as catalytic sites to mimic enzymatic activity, offering improved stability and durability. Both categories benefit from the integration of carbon-based materials, metal nanoparticles, conductive polymers, and hybrid composites, enabling the development of flexible, skin-compatible biosensing systems with wireless communication capabilities. The review critically evaluates sensor performance parameters, including sensitivity, limit of detection, and linear range. Finally, current limitations and future perspectives are discussed. These include the development of multifunctional sensors, closed-loop therapeutic systems, and strategies for enhancing the stability and cost-efficiency of biosensors for broader clinical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.