Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40710329›Full record

ReviewCells2025

Design and Applications of Extracellular Matrix Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering and Regeneration.

Sylvia Mangani, Marios Vetoulas, Katerina Mineschou, Konstantinos Spanopoulos, Maria dM Vivanco, Zoi Piperigkou, Nikos K Karamanos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sylvia ManganiBiochemistry, Biochemical Analysis & Matrix Pathobiology Research Group, Laboratory of Biochemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.
Marios VetoulasBiochemistry, Biochemical Analysis & Matrix Pathobiology Research Group, Laboratory of Biochemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.ORCID 0009-0004-5964-4692
Katerina MineschouBiochemistry, Biochemical Analysis & Matrix Pathobiology Research Group, Laboratory of Biochemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.ORCID 0009-0003-1055-8489
Konstantinos SpanopoulosBiochemistry, Biochemical Analysis & Matrix Pathobiology Research Group, Laboratory of Biochemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.ORCID 0009-0007-0718-3726
Maria dM VivancoCIC bioGUNE, Basque Research and Technology Alliance, BRTA, Technological Park of Bizkaia, 48160 Derio, Spain.
Zoi PiperigkouBiochemistry, Biochemical Analysis & Matrix Pathobiology Research Group, Laboratory of Biochemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-0472-5389
Nikos K KaramanosBiochemistry, Biochemical Analysis & Matrix Pathobiology Research Group, Laboratory of Biochemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-3618-0288

Funding

Federation of European Biochemical Societies (FEBS) FEBS Booster Fund 2024HORIZON-MSCA-2022-SE-01 101130985
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue engineering is a growing field with multidisciplinary players in cell biology, engineering, and medicine, aiming to maintain, restore, or enhance functions of tissues and organs. The extracellular matrix (ECM) plays fundamental roles in tissue development, maintenance, and repair, providing not only structural support, but also critical biochemical and biomechanical cues that regulate cell behavior and signaling. Although its specific composition varies across different tissue types and developmental stages, matrix molecules influence various cell functional properties in every tissue. Given the importance of ECM in morphogenesis, tissue homeostasis, and regeneration, ECM-based bioscaffolds, developed through tissue engineering approaches, have emerged as pivotal tools for recreating the native cellular microenvironment. The aim of this study is to present the main categories of these scaffolds (i.e., natural, synthetic, and hybrid), major fabrication techniques (i.e., tissue decellularization and multidimensional bioprinting), while highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of each category, focusing on biological activity and mechanical performance. Scaffold properties, such as mechanical strength, elasticity, biocompatibility, and biodegradability are essential to their function and integration into host tissues. Applications of ECM-based bioscaffolds span a range of engineering and regenerative strategies, including cartilage, bone, cardiac tissue engineering, and skin wound healing. Despite promising advances, challenges remain in standardization, scalability, and immune response modulation, with future directions directed towards improving ECM-mimetic platforms.

Indexed as

Extracellular MatrixRegenerationTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsHumansdecellularized scaffoldsextracellular matrix scaffoldsmultidimensional bioprintingtissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID40710329
PMCPMC12293650

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.