ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2025
The Influence of Insertion Torque on Stress Distribution in Peri-Implant Bones Around Ultra-Short Implants: An FEA Study.
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Individual, High-Precision 3D Mandibular Model for Finite Element Analysis of Three-Unit Bridges: A Biomechanical Pilot Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Influence of Reduced Cortical Bone Compression by Implant Macrogeometry on Peri-Implant Bone Healing: An In Vitro and In Vivo Experimental Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Bone Compatibility of Experimental Ti-Ag and Ti-Cu Alloy Dental Implants in a Beagle Dog Model.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- CBCT-based virtual surgical planning for predicting risk factors and preventive strategies of buccal plate perforation in maxillary premolar implant placement.Head & face medicine · 2026Article
- Experimental Biomechanical Analysis of the Bone-to-Implant Connection in Single-Piece Implants.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using ultra-short dental implants is a promising alternative to extensive bone grafting procedures for patients with atrophic posterior mandibles and vertical bone loss. However, the amount of insertion torque (IT) applied during implant placement significantly influences stress distribution in the peri-implant bone, which affects implant stability and long-term success. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study used finite element analysis (FEA) to examine how different insertion torques (35 N·cm and 75 N·cm) affect stress distribution in cortical and trabecular bone types D2 and D4 surrounding ultra-short implants. Von Mises equivalent stress values were compared with ultimate bone strength thresholds to evaluate the potential for microdamage during insertion.
resultsThe findings demonstrate that increasing IT from 35 N·cm to 75 N·cm led to a significant increase in peri-implant bone stress. Specifically, cortical bone stress in D4 bone increased from approximately 79 MPa to 142 MPa with higher IT, exceeding physiological limits and elevating the risk of microfractures and bone necrosis. In contrast, lower IT values kept stress within safe limits, ensuring optimal primary stability without damaging the bone. These results underscore the need to strike a balance between achieving sufficient implant stability and avoiding mechanical trauma to the surrounding bone.
conclusionsAccurate control of insertion torque during the placement of ultra-short dental implants is crucial to minimize bone damage and promote optimal osseointegration. Excessive torque, especially in low-density bone, can compromise implant success by inducing excessive stress, thereby increasing the risk of early failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.