Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40710494›Full record

ReviewMarine drugs2025

Greener Extraction Solutions for Microalgal Compounds.

Gwendoline Kopp, Chiara Lauritano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Marine drugs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Inclusion of Supercritical Fluid Extract ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Recovery of Bioactive Compounds from Juçara Palm (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Bioactives fromFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gwendoline KoppMarine Biology Research Group, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281, B-9000 Gent, Belgium.
Chiara LauritanoEcosustainable Marine Biotechnology Department, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Via Ammiraglio Ferdinando Acton 55, 80133 Napoli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4580-9594

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional methods for extracting bioactive compounds from microalgae rely on organic solvents that are both polluting and potentially harmful to human health. In recent years, a noticeable shift has emerged toward greener extraction alternatives that are more environmentally friendly and sustainable. This review highlights various green extraction techniques, compounds, and yields obtained from different microalgal species for a range of applications and provides a comparison between the yields of conventional and green extraction methods. Green extraction methods have shown yields that are comparable to, or even exceed, those of conventional techniques, although they are predominantly studied for the extraction of lipids and pigments. This review aims to provide an overview of the current state of green extraction applied to microalgae, and to outline future research perspectives in this emerging field.

Indexed as

Green Chemistry TechnologyMicroalgaeHumansLipidsSolventsLipidsSolventsbioactive compoundsgreen extractionlipidsmicroalgaepigments

Identifiers

PMID40710494
PMCPMC12298023

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.