ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Advancements in Nanotechnology for Spinal Surgery: Innovations in Spinal Fixation Devices for Enhanced Biomechanical Performance and Osteointegration.
Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reimagining Spinal Surgery at the Nanoscale: Smart Implants, Targeted Therapies, and Translational Challenges.Biology · 2026Review
- Laser-Driven Surface Alloying of Ti6Al4V: Coupled Microstructural Evolution, Phase Behavior, and Mechanical Performance.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal injuries have a major impact on patients' quality of life due to the implacable consequences they bring, such as reduced mobility and loss of flexibility, in most cases requiring surgery to restore spinal stability and functionality. In this respect, spinal fixation devices represent an important strategy to stabilize the spine after severe injuries or degenerative conditions, providing structural support and preserving spinal function. However, at the moment, the materials used to manufacture spinal implants present numerous disadvantages (e.g., Young's modulus larger than cortical bone, which can produce bone resorption and implant enlargement) that can lead to implant failure. In this context, nanotechnology can offer promising solutions, bringing improved properties (e.g., biocompatibility, osseointegration, and increased mechanical performance) that increase the potential for obtaining devices customized to patients' needs. Thus, the present work aims to present an overview of the types of nanocoating surface modification, the impact of rough and porous implant surfaces, and the integration of bioactive nanoparticles that reduce the risk of infection and implant rejection. In addition, incorporating 3D printing technology and the use of biodegradable materials into the discussion provides a valuable perspective for future studies in this field. Although the emerging results are encouraging, further studies to assess the long-term safety of implant coatings are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.