Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40711520›Full record

ArticleIrish journal of medical science2025

Diagnostic yield of bidirectional gastrointestinal system endoscopy for iron deficiency anemia.

Gökmen Güzel, Muhammer Ergenç

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gökmen GüzelDepartment of General Surgery, Serik State Hospital Merkez Mah, 2026. Sk, Serik, 07500, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5616-9580
Muhammer ErgençDepartment of General Surgery, Marmara University School of Medicine, Başıbüyük Mah. Başıbüyük Yolu Sok. No: 9/2, Maltepe, 34854, Istanbul, Turkey. muhammerergenc@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9233-0570

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe aimed to determine the diagnostic yield of bidirectional endoscopy in patients with iron deficiency anemia (IDA) by analyzing patients admitted to our clinic to investigate the etiology of IDA and those who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy.

methodsPatients who underwent upper and/or lower gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy procedures to investigate the IDA etiology in our hospital between May 2020 and November 2023 were included. Demographics, EGD and colonoscopic intervention reports, and pathological findings of all endoscopic procedures were analyzed.

resultsA total of 314 patients were analyzed. One hundred and fifty patients (47.8%) were male and 164 (52.2%) were female, and the median age was 63 (17-90) years for male patients and 57 (22-87) years for female patients. Bidirectional GI endoscopy was performed in the same session in 281 patients (89.5%), colonoscopy in 13 patients (4.1%), and EGD in 20 patients (6.4%). While our rate of detecting the cause of IDA was 10.5% in patients who underwent EGD or colonoscopy as a single procedure, it was 89.5% in patients who underwent bidirectional GI endoscopy.

conclusionBidirectional gastrointestinal endoscopy may be considered a valuable approach for identifying the etiology of iron deficiency anemia in adult patients, regardless of age and sex, particularly in appropriate clinical contexts.

Indexed as

Anemia, Iron-DeficiencyEndoscopy, Digestive SystemEndoscopy, GastrointestinalAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColonoscopyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAnemiaBidirectional endoscopyColonoscopyEsophagogastroduodenoscopyIron deficiency

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.