ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2025
Physician Perceptions, Knowledge, and Implementation of Lipid-Lowering Guidelines in the USA.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge, Use, and Barriers in Dyslipidemia Management: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Clinicians.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Optimizing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) management - a US physician survey of barriers and burdens.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe burden of elevated LDL-C and the impact on ASCVD risk remain high, as does underuse of guideline recommended lipid-lowering treatment (LLT). The extent of clinician familiarity with LLT guidelines and barriers to implementation are unknown.
methodsA cross-sectional study design was used, consisting of a 30-min online survey of cardiologists and primary care physicians (PCPs). US physicians were included if they self-reported practicing for ≥ 2 years and prescribed LLT to ≥ 50 patients monthly. Survey questions about LLT practice perceptions were informed by literature and expert opinion. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
resultsThe study sample included 200 cardiologists and 201 PCPs (mean age 50 years, mostly male (76%) and white (63%)). One-fourth (25%) of cardiologists and 42% of PCPs reported being somewhat, slightly or not at all familiar with the 2018 US AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol. More than half of cardiologists (51%) and PCPs (64%) found at least one section of the guidelines confusing: almost a third of cardiologists (27%) and PCPs (28%) found guidance on LDL-C treatment goals confusing and about one-fifth of physicians (24% of PCP and 16% of cardiologists) reported confusion with the section on managing treatment choices. Both reported patient and administrative challenges to implementing lipid guidelines, most notably, patient resistance to taking prescription medication (62%). Other common implementation challenges included difficulty enforcing behavioral changes, patient's lack of understanding of risk, and administrative burden.
conclusionsMore than half of all physicians found at least one section of the LLT guidelines confusing and noted patient behavior as a major challenge to their implementation. This survey provides insights into physician perceptions regarding implementation of LLT guideline recommendations. Additional research is required to further understand the barriers to implementation and the associated impact on clinical decision making and patient outcomes.
Identifiers
40711632What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.