ArticleObesity surgery2025
A Nomogram for Prediction of Weight Loss Outcomes after Bariatric Surgery.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to comprehensively investigate the factors influencing weight reduction outcomes one year after bariatric surgery and construct a Nomogram.
methodsA retrospective study analyzed 546 patients who underwent bariatric surgery at the bariatric center from 2015 to 2021. They were randomly divided into a 7:3 ratio for a training set (382 cases) and a testing set (164 cases). Univariate logistic regression and two machine learning techniques (LASSO, best subset regression) were employed for variable selection. The optimal model was derived via stepwise backward regression, Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), and Area Under the Curve (AUC). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, calibration curve analysis, and Hosmer-Lemeshow test were employed to graphically evaluate and validate the performance of the model, while decision curve analysis (DCA) was utilized to assess its clinical value.
resultsThe predictive factors in the final nomogram included hip circumference, the surgical procedure and T2DM. Utilizing these three independent risk factors, a nomogram prediction model was developed, demonstrating robust discriminative ability with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.742 (95% CI: 0.672-0.813) for the training set and 0.726 (95% CI: 0.607-0.845) for the test set. Furthermore, the model exhibited high accuracy, as evidenced by the non-significant Hosmer-Lemeshow test (P > 0.05) for both the validation and test sets. The decision curve analysis further confirmed the model's effectiveness in accurately predicting one-year weight loss outcomes following bariatric surgery.
conclusionThe nomogram prediction model based on hip circumference, surgical procedure, and T2DM reasonably predicts one-year weight loss after bariatric surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40711702What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.