Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40712154›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

The Power of Strategic Social Media Influencer Communication to Improve Black Women's Knowledge and Awareness of Environmental Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: Surveys of Instagram Users.

Elissia T Franklin, Katherine E Boronow, Jennifer Liss Ohayon, Aleyana Momplaisir, Jenell Steele, Camille Kathleen Smith, LaShannon Taylor, Breanna D Brock, Korie A Grayson, Kalere Edgecombe and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Elissia T FranklinSilent Spring Institute, 320 Nevada Street, unit 302, Newton, MA, 02460, United States, 1 6173324288, 1 6173324284.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1017-9927
Katherine E BoronowSilent Spring Institute, 320 Nevada Street, unit 302, Newton, MA, 02460, United States, 1 6173324288, 1 6173324284.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3243-9005
Jennifer Liss OhayonSilent Spring Institute, 320 Nevada Street, unit 302, Newton, MA, 02460, United States, 1 6173324288, 1 6173324284.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2681-4187
Aleyana MomplaisirResilient Sisterhood Project, Cambridge, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-4271-8618
Jenell SteeleTriple G, LLC, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-3136-0619
Camille Kathleen SmithSTEM So(ul)cial, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-7605-5815
LaShannon TaylorDepartment of Biology, Alabama A&M University, Huntsville, AL, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0337-5339
Breanna D BrockDepartment of Sociology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-7125-1671
Korie A Grayson(Re)Defining the Image of STEM, LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7598-5009
Kalere EdgecombePrincess Margaret Hospital, Public Hospital Authority, Nassau, Bahamas.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-1987-1960
Brittany S HarrisThe New Era Creative, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-9655-8173
Kristen N PenderPolecology, LLC, Petersburg, FL, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1146-0195
Ijeoma B KolaUniversity of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8110-7197
Adana Am LlanosDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9954-9121
Dede K Teteh-BrooksDepartment of Health Disparities Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9552-148X
Lilly MarcelinResilient Sisterhood Project, Cambridge, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-1921-4653
Julia Green BrodySilent Spring Institute, 320 Nevada Street, unit 302, Newton, MA, 02460, United States, 1 6173324288, 1 6173324284.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5566-3053
Robin E DodsonSilent Spring Institute, 320 Nevada Street, unit 302, Newton, MA, 02460, United States, 1 6173324288, 1 6173324284.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7356-9511

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Black women are disproportionately affected by hormone-related health conditions, which may result from higher exposures to endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) in consumer products. EDCs are chemicals that interfere with the body's natural hormones. Objective: The Product Options in Women-Engaged Research project was developed to educate Black women about EDCs. We assessed the impact of strategic social media influencer (SMI) communication on knowledge and awareness of EDCs and intentions to change product-use behaviors. Methods: We recruited 7 SMIs to engage with their audiences about EDC-related information on Instagram. The SMIs attended a workshop to learn about EDCs in consumer products and then created Instagram content to share with their audiences. We surveyed SMIs at baseline and 1 month after they shared EDC-related content. SMI audiences were surveyed cross-sectionally before and after the SMIs posted EDC-related social media content. We evaluated social media engagement and analyzed the impact of these communications on SMIs and their audience. Results: The social media posts reached over 16,000 accounts and elicited over 28,000 engagements (eg, views, likes, and shares). SMIs' EDC knowledge and awareness increased after attending the workshop and sharing newly created content, and the SMIs had greater intentions to avoid EDCs at follow-up than at baseline. Engagement with the social media content about EDCs also led to positive outcomes among SMI audiences and particularly impacted intentions to engage in exposure reduction behaviors. In total, 80% of follow-up survey respondents reported that, in the future, they will always consider a company's chemical policy (n=68) and product ingredients when shopping (n=73) compared to 26.8% (n=63) and 46.9% (n=115), respectively, of baseline survey respondents who already reported doing so (P<.001). More follow-up respondents than baseline respondents self-reported an intention to avoid parabens (n=33, 32.7% vs n=39, 15.3%; P<.001), bisphenol A (n=25, 24.8% vs n=38, 14.9%; P=.03), per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (n=17, 16.8% vs n=9, 3.5%; P<.001), and fragrance (n=6, 5.9% vs n=5, 2.0%; P=.08). Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that strategic SMI partnerships incorporating a culturally tailored training program can be used to reach large audiences of Black women, improve knowledge about EDCs, and promote intentions to change behaviors to reduce exposures to EDCs.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanCommunicationEndocrine DisruptorsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeSocial MediaAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesEndocrine DisruptorsawarenessBlack womenchemical exposureconsumer productsendocrine-disrupting chemicalsenvironmental health literacyenvironmental justicehealth literacyInstagramintended behaviorspersonal care productsproduct options in women-engaged researchproduct-use behaviorssocial mediasocial media influencerswomen

Identifiers

PMID40712154
PMCPMC12296211

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.