ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2025
Linking phenotype to genotype using comprehensive genomic comparisons.
Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Standing HA phenotypic breadth shapes H5N1 cross-host potential.Research square · 2026Article
- The genetic foundations of convergent traits.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Integrative Advances in Equine Genomics From Reference Assemblies to Evolutionary History and Key Traits.Evolutionary applications · 2026Review
- Genome Evolution and the Enigmatic Axial Skeleton of the Hero Shew (Soricidae: Scutisorex Somereni).Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Convergent reduction in skeletal density during benthic to pelagic transitions in Baikal sculpins.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Parallel Reduction in Skeletal Density During Benthic to Pelagic Transitions in Baikal Sculpins.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- From individuals to communities: How genomics is transforming biodiversity conservation.Genetics and molecular biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Comparative genomics is a powerful approach to illuminate the genetic basis of phenotypic diversity across macro-evolutionary timescales. Recent advances in sequencing, genome assembly, annotation, and comparative methods promoted large-scale analyses that unveiled genomic determinants contributing to differences in cognition, metabolism, and body plans as well as phenotypes with biomedical relevance, such as cancer resistance, longevity, and viral tolerance. These studies highlight joint contributions of multiple molecular mechanisms and indicate an underappreciated role for gene and enhancer losses driving phenotypic change. However, challenges remain, including comprehensive phenotype databases and genome annotations, improved approaches for identifying lineage-specific adaptations, and functional tests. Here, we review recent progress, highlight major discoveries, and discuss future directions for linking phenotype to genotype using comparative genomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.