ReviewThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2025
Disclosure of Alzheimer's disease blood-based biomarker results in a primary care setting: Opportunities and challenges.
Review in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Alzheimer's Association clinical practice guideline for the Diagnostic Evaluation, Testing, Counseling, and Disclosure of Suspected Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders (DETeCD-ADRD): Executive summary of recommendations for specialty care.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Guideline
- Blood-based biomarkers and early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Clinical implementation of digital cognitive assessments - recommendations from Global CEO Initiative on Alzheimer's Disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Worry and Anxiety in the Era of Early Diagnosis and Disease Modifying Treatment for Alzheimer's Disease.Current psychiatry reports · 2026Review
- Dementia diagnostic deserts: workforce and geographic inequities in the diagnostic pathway for cognitive impairment.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Leading by example: How the Webster team's systematic review quietly rebuked the field's preoccupation with biomarker "disclosure," and why it matters.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2026Article
- Amyloid Beta in Alzheimer's Disease: Mechanisms, Biomarker Potential, and Therapeutic Targets.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Review
- From cognitive screening to digital phenotyping: rethinking early detection of cognitive impairment in primary care.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Blood-based biomarkers (BBMs) for Alzheimer's disease (AD) have advanced rapidly and may be a critical tool for broad community-based screening for AD and detection of AD pathology in individuals with cognitive impairment. To meet the impending demand for AD diagnosis, BBMs could be implemented in a primary care setting to maximize accessibility and efficiency. However, this primary care implementation would be associated with numerous challenges, including issues related to disclosure of test results to patients. In this perspective article, we highlight the need for and potential challenges of AD BBM results disclosure in a primary care setting. Drawing from existing studies of AD risk disclosure, we highlight key areas of consideration to maximize patient safety and comprehension of results. Resources are suggested to aid health systems in implementing BBM testing in primary care settings. Finally, we emphasize the need for further research on the accuracy of BBMs and the practice of disclosure in primary care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.