ArticleBMC public health2025
Exploring the perceptions of sedentary behaviour in community-dwelling older adults aged 75 and older: a series of focus group interviews.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Interventions to reduce sedentary behaviour in community-dwelling older adults: a mixed-method review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025Pooled it
- The Meaning of Sedentary Behavior for People with Spinal Cord Injury: A Reflexive Thematic Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy and skeletal muscle: A narrative review synthesizing adult evidence with implications for older adults.JAR life · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOlder adults are the most sedentary and fastest-growing demographic, yet adults aged ≥ 75 years are underrepresented in sedentary behaviour research. This study qualitatively explored how this age group perceives sedentary behaviour, the activities they perform in sitting and standing, and the barriers and facilitators to reducing their sedentary behaviour.
methodsFour focus groups were conducted with a consistent group of 6 community-dwelling older adults aged ≥ 75 years from West Yorkshire were held between October-December 2022. Audio recordings and focus group notes were transcribed verbatim and an inductive and deductive thematic analysis was conducted. The activities performed in sitting and standing were charted to the ecological model of sedentary behaviour, and barriers and facilitators to reducing sedentary time were charted to the Capability Opportunity Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) framework.
resultsParticipants were largely unaware of their sedentary behaviour or the associated health risks. Sitting activities were predominantly leisurely in nature, and occurred in older adults' homes. Barriers and facilitators to reducing sedentary behaviour were mapped to the COM-B model. Key influences included physical and mental health, environmental constraints, social support, ingrained routines, and limited awareness of the health impacts of prolonged sitting. Analytical themes included the perceived progression of sedentary behaviour throughout older adulthood; the impact of prolonged sitting on sleep; and the role of social connectedness in reducing sedentary time.
conclusionsThis study provided insights into older adults' reports of sedentary behaviour progressing throughout older adulthood. When compared to the wider literature, sedentary behaviour in adults aged ≥ 75 years present similarly to a younger subset of older adults with regards to the activities performed in sitting, and the barriers and facilitators to reducing their sedentary time. However, the activities performed in sitting may be performed for longer, and the barriers to reducing sedentary behaviour may present more frequently. Social support appears valuable when attempting to reduce sedentary time, however, further research is necessary to explore the views of older adults who are socially isolated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.