ArticleBMC medical education2025
Refining AI perspectives: assessing the impact of ai curricular on medical students' attitudes towards artificial intelligence.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Integrating artificial intelligence into medical education: a narrative systematic review of current applications, challenges, and future directions.BMC medical education · 2025Pooled it
- The effect of artificial intelligence-based scenarios on the clinical education of rehabilitation students: an anatomy-based randomized controlled study.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Assessing the integration of digitalization and AI in general medicine curricula in German-speaking Europe: a comprehensive survey.Medical education online · 2026Article
- Development and Usability Evaluation of an E-Learning Tool for Blended Learning in Pediatric Endocrinology: Formative Pilot Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- The Design-Driven Innovation Path of Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence in the Field of Healthcare: Theory, Practice, and Future Prospects.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Identifying necessary conditions for medical students' adoption of AI in the future practice: a survey study in Canada.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- The Influencing Factors of Medical Postgraduates' Usage Intention Toward Artificial Intelligence-Generated Content Tools in Academic Research: Qualitative Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Knowledge, perception, and attitude of healthcare students towards artificial intelligence: a multi-center cross sectional study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Generative AI in perioperative medicine and anesthesiology: ethical integration, educational innovation, and the future of clinical professionalism.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Review
- Bridging the mentorship divide: how large language models could reshape medical workforce equity.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Attitudes and perceptions of dental students and interns toward AI in dentistry: a cross-sectional survey in a Saudi population.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in veterinary education: self-perceived knowledge, use, and attitudes among veterinary students in Spain and Portugal.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Current Landscape of Curriculum Development and Implementation in Medical Artificial Intelligence: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology: Acceptance, Clinical Integration, and Educational Needs in Switzerland.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study explores the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) curricula on medical students' perceptions of AI, a critical topic given AI's transformative potential in healthcare and its rapid integration into medical practice and education. Using data from a global cross-sectional survey involving 4,596 students across 48 countries, we employed Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM) to address selection bias and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to examine mediating effects. Regression models were also applied to estimate the relationships between AI curricular and students' knowledge about and attitudes towards AI. Results reveal that participation in AI curricula significantly enhances students' knowledge about AI (β = .140, p < .001), equipping them with essential skills for AI-driven healthcare systems. However, it concurrently diminishes their enthusiasm for integrating AI into medical education (β = -.108, p < .001), reflecting potential concerns about ethical and professional implications. No significant effects were observed on students' attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence application in medicine, the physician's role, or AI-related ethical and legal conflicts. Heterogeneity analysis shows stronger positive effects on knowledge for veterinary students and those from developing countries, where AI education addresses critical resource gaps. Conversely, the negative effect on enthusiasm for AI teaching is more pronounced among students from developed countries, where advanced AI applications are more prevalent. SEM results reveal that preparedness for work with AI partially mediates the relationship between AI curricula and students' knowledge (β = .062, p < .001) and attitudes (β = .023, p < .001), adding theoretical depth to the findings. These results underscore the importance of balanced AI education to enhance knowledge while addressing concerns about its integration in education. This research has significant practical and theoretical implications, emphasizing the need for tailored AI curricula that align with students' professional goals and regional educational contexts. The study offers pathways for optimizing AI literacy globally, bridging resource disparities, and preparing future healthcare professionals for AI-driven advancements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.