Observational studyBMC women's health2025
Trends in maternal mortality in Latin America and the caribbean: a joinpoint analysis.
Observational study in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical, social, and occupational determinants of severe preeclampsia: a multifactorial case-control study on maternal health inequities in Peru.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMaternal mortality remains a significant public health issue in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), with high incidence rates in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC). While maternal mortality decreased by nearly 45% between 1990 and 2015, regional inequalities persist. This study assesses maternal mortality trends in LAC women from 1997 to 2019, providing key insights to address this issue.
methodsAn ecological observational time-series study was conducted using data from the WHO Mortality Database for 18 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean between 1997 and 2019, focusing on women aged 15–49 years. Age-standardized maternal mortality rates (ASMR) per 100,000 person-years were estimated using the direct method, based on the SEGI world standard population. The MMR, defined as maternal deaths per 100,000 live births, was calculated using data from the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO). Trends were analyzed using Joinpoint regression to estimate the Annual Percentage Change (APC) and Average Annual Percentage Change (AAPC), with p < 0.05 indicating statistical significance.
resultsThe highest maternal mortality rates in 1997 were reported in Guatemala, Nicaragua, and Paraguay, while by 2019, Venezuela, the Dominican Republic, and Paraguay had the highest rates. Similarly, the highest maternal mortality ratios (MMRs) in 2019 were observed in Venezuela, the Dominican Republic, and Paraguay. Joinpoint regression identified significant annual reductions in maternal mortality rates in seven countries—particularly Nicaragua (AAPC: −6.7%) and Guatemala (AAPC: −4.2%)—while Venezuela exhibited a significant increase (AAPC: +5.3%). Regarding MMR trends, the most notable improvements were seen in Nicaragua (AAPC: −4.5%) and Costa Rica (AAPC: −2.0%), whereas Brazil, Puerto Rico, and Venezuela experienced significant upward trends.
conclusionsDespite overall progress, regional differences in maternal mortality persist across Latin America and the Caribbean. These variations highlight the importance of strengthening maternal health systems, improving access to skilled birth attendance, and ensuring quality prenatal and postnatal care. Future studies should explore underlying contextual and structural factors driving these trends and promote the use of disaggregated data to inform equitable health policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.