ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Real-time multicomponent remote rehabilitation versus self-rehabilitation for sarcopenia: a randomized controlled trial protocol.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06937073 (Comparative Study of Multi-component Real-time Remote Rehabilitation and Self Rehabilitation in the Treatment of Sarcopenia), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparative Study of Multi-component Real-time Remote Rehabilitation and Self Rehabilitation in the Treatment of Sarcopenia
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness of Interactive Remote Rehabilitation After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- High prevalence and multifactorial risks of sarcopenia in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Pooled it
- Serum parathyroid hormone and risk of sarcopenia: a meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Pooled it
- Public knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward heat stroke in Ningbo, China: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSarcopenia is a progressive skeletal muscle disorder prevalent among older adults and is associated with increased risk of disability, falls, and mortality. Although resistance training and adequate nutritional intake are well-supported by clinical evidence, their implementation is often limited by poor adherence and insufficient access to supervised interventions. This trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a real-time multicomponent remote rehabilitation program versus standard self-rehabilitation in older adults with sarcopenia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single-center, randomized, controlled, two-arm trial will be conducted at West China Hospital, Sichuan University. A total of 104 community-dwelling adults aged 60-75 years meeting the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) diagnostic criteria will be randomly assigned (1:1) to either an intervention or a control group. The intervention group will receive personalized exercise and dietary guidance via a WeChat-based application with daily remote supervision from therapists. The control group will receive non-interactive, text- and image-based static dietary guidance and unsupervised exercise instructions. The primary outcome is knee extensor strength at 12 weeks, assessed using a dynamometer. Secondary outcomes include knee flexor strength, handgrip strength, 6-metre gait speed, Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT), 6-minute walk distance (6MWT), and appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (ASMI), and reversal of sarcopenia. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, week 6, and week 12 by blinded assessors. Statistical analysis will be performed using R software (v4.4.0), with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China (Approval No. 2024-2455). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and academic conferences regardless of outcome direction. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number NCT06937073, April 2025).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.