ArticleBMC oral health2025
Oral health status and quality of life among pregnant women with oral health problems: a descriptive study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Socioeconomic, access-related, and periodontal factors associated with oral health-related quality of life among pregnant women in primary health care: a cross-sectional study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Association between self-reported oral health and oral health-related quality of life among pregnant women in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Management of Odontogenic Infections in Pregnant Patients: Case-Based Approach and Literature Review.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOral health is essential for pregnant women to maintain their general health, well-being, and overall quality of life. The natural physiological process of pregnancy causes brief alterations in women's immune system, metabolism, hormone levels, and physical composition.
methodsA descriptive study was conducted among 258 pregnant women at selected primary health centers of Dakshina Kannada District, Karnataka state, India. Cluster sampling techniques were employed to choose the taluks. Six to seven primary health centers each were chosen randomly from two taluks, namely Bantwal and Belthangadi. Pregnant women were screened for oral health problems at antenatal clinics of Primary Health Centers. Pregnant women with oral health problems were recruited to assess the quality of life, and those with systemic diseases were excluded from the study. The data were collected using the demographic proforma, Oral health assessment tool, and oral health impact profile-14 scale.
resultThe findings indicate that pregnant women had mild to moderate oral health problems (74.8%). Oral health problems had a mild impact on the quality of life of more than half (57.8%) of pregnant women and 42.2% had a moderate effect on quality of life. Study found a significant association of quality of life with the baseline characteristics like monthly income of the family (i.e. F = 4.109, p = 0.008) and previous information regarding oral health (i.e. F = 5.581, p = 0.019).
conclusionThis study found that most pregnant women had mild to moderate oral health problems, which affected their quality of life. Baseline variables such as family income and prior knowledge about oral health were associated with these outcomes. The study highlights the need for prenatal oral health counselling and the role of trained Community Health Workers in promoting good oral hygiene.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.