ArticleBMC women's health2025
Navigating the future landscape of uterine fibroid research: a comprehensive summary of patient-centered outcome measures and implications.
Article in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUterine fibroid constitutes a significant burden for affected women and research in this area has increasingly focused on patient-centered outcomes, with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) becoming crucial in related studies.
objectivesWe aim to summarize the key aspects and PROMs utilized in previous studies, recommend suitable tools for effective evaluations, and emphasize critical areas for future research.
methodA literature search was conducted in the Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and Web of Science databases, covering the period from inception through October 2024. MAIN
results75 studies met the criteria for inclusion and these studies highlight that PROMs utilized in research associated with uterine fibroids encompass a wide range of evaluations, spanning from quality of life, menstrual details, psychological well-being, pelvic floor conditions, pain intensity, menopause symptoms, to sexual function, body image, and other related assessments. Despite using various PROMs in published studies, current clinical trials on uterine fibroids mainly rely on general questionnaires, employing questionnaires specifically designed for uterine fibroids.
conclusionBy summarizing the research, we provide an overview of existing PROMs for uterine fibroids, revealing a gap due to the lack of specific PROMs. This review contributes to uterine fibroid research by promoting accurate assessments, leading to better treatment options and enhanced patient quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.