Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40713694›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2025

Imaging in animal models: bridging experimental findings and human pathophysiology.

Lucas Rodrigues Moraes, Amanda Costa Cotias, Marco Aurélio Martins, Martin Scharffenberg, Christian Schnabel, Robert Huhle, Patricia Rieken Macedo Rocco, Pedro Leme Silva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lucas Rodrigues MoraesLaboratório de Investigação Pulmonar, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho - UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Amanda Costa CotiasLaboratório de Inflamação, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Marco Aurélio MartinsLaboratório de Inflamação, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Martin ScharffenbergDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary Engineering Group, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Christian SchnabelDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary Engineering Group, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Robert HuhleDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary Engineering Group, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Patricia Rieken Macedo RoccoLaboratório de Investigação Pulmonar, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho - UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Pedro Leme SilvaLaboratório de Investigação Pulmonar, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho - UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. pedroleme@biof.ufrj.br.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 403485/2020-7Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro E-26/201.058/2022Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro E-26/210.777/2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and pulmonary fibrosis are major respiratory conditions associated with significant morbidity and, in some cases, high mortality. A variety of animals models have been established to study these disorders, primarily focusing on histologic alterations, cellular signalling pathways, inflammatory responses, lung perfusion, gas-exchange abnormalities, and response to emerging therapies. Imaging techniques play a crucial role in these investigations, enabling in vivo assessment of lung structure and function. The most widely used imaging modalities include computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), and electrical impedance tomography (EIT). While CT and, to a variable extent, PET involve ionizing radiation, EIT is a radiation-free technique. Despite anatomical differences between species, many imaging and physiological findings observed in animal models are consistent with those seen in critically ill patients, enhancing their translational relevance. This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of the applicability of these imaging techniques in animal models and explores their relevance to human pathophysiology and clinical management.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsHumansLungPositron-Emission TomographyPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRespiratory Distress SyndromeTomography, X-Ray ComputedAnimal modelsComputed tomographyElectrical impedance tomographyImagingLung perfusionVentilation

Identifiers

PMID40713694
PMCPMC12297864

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.