ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025
Ulinastatin inhibits macrophage M1 polarization to improve acute pancreatitis-associated intestinal barrier dysfunction by promoting Nrf2 signaling pathway activation.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Severe Acute Pancreatitis: Pathogenesis and Clinical Management.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Review
- Ulinastatin-somatostatin combination for acute severe pancreatitis: enhanced clinical efficacy and reduced serum inflammation.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntestinal barrier dysfunction plays a significant role in the development of pancreatic necrosis and multiple organ failure in AP. This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic effects and potential mechanisms of ulinastatin (UTI) on L-arginine-induced acute pancreatitis (AP)-associated intestinal barrier dysfunction in rats.
methodsExperimental rats were randomly divided into five subgroups as follows: control, AP, AP + UTI, AP + ML-385 and AP + UTI + ML-385. The pancreatic and intestinal injuries were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), western blot, pathology, laser Doppler and transmission electron microscope (TEM). The inflammatory biomarkers were determined by western blot and the indicators of oxidative stress were also measured. The Nrf2 signaling pathway and macrophage polarization were evaluated by immunofluorescence staining, western blot and qRT-PCR analysis.
resultsUlinastatin treatment effectively improved both AP and AP-associated intestinal barrier dysfunction. Moreover, ulinastatin treatment significantly decreased the levels of pro-inflammatory factors and peroxides while significantly increasing the levels of anti-inflammatory factors and antioxidants. Mechanistically, ulinastatin treatment inhibited M1 macrophage polarization, achieved by activating the Nrf2 signaling pathway and facilitating Nrf2 nuclear translocation. The application of ML-385 to intercept Nrf2 eliminated ulinastatin-mediated suppression of macrophage M1 polarization and inflammation.
conclusionsUlinastatin protected against both AP and the associated intestinal barrier dysfunction. It suppressed the inflammatory response and oxidative stress by promoting Nrf2 nuclear translocation and inhibiting M1 macrophage polarization through the activation of the Nrf2 signaling pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.