Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40713783›Full record

ArticleContraception and reproductive medicine2025

Acceptability of and preferences for long-acting injectable hormonal contraception among US women: evidence from a national cross-sectional online survey.

Ann Gottert, Timothy Abuya, Elizabeth Proos, Isabella Johnson, Nathan H Dormer, Ulrike Foley, Grace Saul, Lisa B Haddad, David R Friend

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception and reproductive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ann GottertPopulation Council, 1 dag hammarskjold Plaza, New York, NY, USA. agottert@popcouncil.org.
Timothy AbuyaPopulation Council, 1 dag hammarskjold Plaza, New York, NY, USA.
Elizabeth ProosDaré Bioscience Inc, San Diego, CA, USA.
Isabella JohnsonDaré Bioscience Inc, San Diego, CA, USA.
Nathan H DormerAdare Pharma Solutions, Lenexa, KS, USA.
Ulrike FoleyAdare Pharma Solutions, Lenexa, KS, USA.
Grace SaulPopulation Council, 1 dag hammarskjold Plaza, New York, NY, USA.
Lisa B HaddadPopulation Council, 1 dag hammarskjold Plaza, New York, NY, USA.
David R FriendDaré Bioscience Inc, San Diego, CA, USA.

Funding

Defining end-user preferences among US women to optimize the design of a long-acting injectable hormonal contraceptiveR43HD108820 · NICHD · DARE BIOSCIENCE, INC. · PI FRIEND, DAVID R · 2022 to 2022
$249k
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development R43HD108820NICHD NIH HHS R43 HD108820
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-acting injectable (LAI) hormonal contraception offers a promising approach to meet women's pregnancy prevention needs. We sought to understand acceptability of and preferences for LAI hormonal contraception among US women, to optimize the design of a sustained-release LAI in development - including which durations to pursue.

methodsWe implemented a national cross-sectional online survey including a discrete choice experiment (DCE) with women ages 18-44 years currently using or interested in using contraception. Recruitment was via Prime Panels. DCE attributes included potential duration of effectiveness (6/12/24-months), effect on menses, side effects, and timing of return-to-fertility after use. We used mixed-multinomial logit models to analyze the data.

resultsWomen (n = 1,029) were 28.6 years old on-average, from 49 US states. 30.9% were Black/African American; 11.6% Hispanic/Latina. 71.6% were nulliparous; 49.0% did not want a(nother) child. Common current contraceptive methods were birth control pills (37.4%), male condoms (35.7%), and withdrawal (19.8%); 18.9% reported having had an unintended pregnancy. In the DCE, women had strong negative preferences for: may cause heavier/unpredictable periods, mild headaches/nausea, slight weight gain, and delayed return-to-fertility (6-12 vs. 3 months), and positive preferences for: may cause no period, and shorter/lighter periods (all p < 0.001). Women also preferred the 12-month to the 6-month duration (p = 0.03). When asked directly about their interest in an LAI with no/minimal side effects/effects on menses and quick return-to-fertility, 92.4% expressed interest, with two-thirds preferring a longer duration (12 or 24-months), and one-third the 6-month duration. Preference for the 6-month duration (vs. 12 or 24) was most highly associated with wanting a child within five years, and higher discomfort with hormones (both p < 0.001).

conclusionsUS women report high interest in an LAI. Interest substantially decreases if the LAI may cause unwanted effects such as heavier/unpredictable periods, mild headaches/nausea, slight weight gain, or delayed return-to-fertility. While longer duration (12 + months) is preferred overall, having a 6-month option appears important especially for women who may want to get pregnant within the next few years, and those concerned about hormones (to try it before using a longer duration).

Indexed as

ContraceptiveFamily planningInjectionSustained release; discrete choice experimentUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40713783
PMCPMC12291294

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.