ReviewGut pathogens2025
Gut microbiome and gastric cancer: microbial interactions and therapeutic potential.
Review in Gut pathogens, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbial Signatures in Head and Neck versus Gastrointestinal Tumors: Identification and Prognostic Modeling.Polish journal of microbiology · 2026Article
- Intratumoral Microbiome of Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- The Potential Anticancer Mechanisms of Probiotics: A Comprehensive Review.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Microbial signatures with diagnostic potential in early gastric cancer: insights beyond H. pylori.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Revisiting multi-region 16S sequencing in gastric cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Integrated multi-omics profiling reveals phenotype- and tissue-specific host-microbiota interactions in paired tumor and peritumoral tissues of advanced gastric cancer patients from Northwest China.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- The Gut Microbiome's Impact on the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Gastric Cancer-An Updated Literature Review.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of gastric cancer is significantly influenced by the intestinal microbiota, with H. pylori serving as a major risk factor. Through genotoxic effects, persistent inflammation, and metabolic changes, other microbes also play a role. It has been demonstrated that cancer patients and healthy people have different microbiome compositions. Cancer can be inhibited or promoted by the gut microbiota and its metabolites. The relationship between intestinal flora, bacterial extracellular vesicles, and the tumor microenvironment directly affects tumor progression and efficacy of anti-tumor medications, indicating the importance of the tumor microenvironment in tumor survival. Gastrointestinal malignancies may be brought on by the gut microbiome's dysregulation of non-coding RNA expression. Non-coding RNAs are intriguing avenues for future therapeutic and diagnostic research. The tumor microenvironment is altered by bacterial extracellular vesicles, which may have an effect on immunosuppression, treatment resistance, metastasis, and cancer progression. Further research is required to completely understand the involvement of non-coding RNAs in GI cancers. By modifying drug metabolism and absorption, which have a substantial impact on healing efficacy and serious impact profiles, the dynamic changes in gut microbiota also have a considerable impact on the results of anti-cancer treatment. Improved treatment approaches may arise from a better understanding of the role of the microbiome in gastric malignancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.