ArticleScientific reports2025
Deep representation learning using layer-wise VICReg losses.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper presents a layer-wise training procedure of neural networks by minimizing a Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization (VICReg) loss at each layer. The procedure is beneficial when annotated data are scarce but enough unlabeled data are present. Being able to update the parameters locally at each layer also handles problems such as vanishing gradient and initialization sensitivity in backpropagation. The procedure utilizes two forward passes instead of one forward and one backward pass as done in backpropagation, where one forward pass works on original data and the other on an augmented version of the data. It is shown that this procedure can construct more compact but informative spaces progressively at each layer. The architecture of the model is selected to be pyramidal, enabling effective feature extraction. In addition, we optimize weights for variance, invariance, and covariance terms of the loss function so that the model can capture higher-level semantic information optimally. After training the model, we assess its learned representations by measuring clustering quality metrics and performance on classification tasks utilizing a few labeled data. To evaluate the proposed approach, we do several experiments with different datasets: MNIST, EMNIST, Fashion MNIST, and CIFAR-100. The experimental results show that the training procedure enhances the classification accuracy of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) trained on MNIST, EMNIST, Fashion MNIST, and CIFAR-100 by approximately 7%, 16%, 1%, and 7% respectively compared to the baseline models of similar architectures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.