ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and quality evaluation of high-protein gluten-free pasta formulations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enrichment of Gluten-Free Fresh Pasta With Cricket Flour: Technological and Nutritional Quality.Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
- Development of Innovative Gluten-Free and Egg-Free Pasta from Acorn Flour and Carob-Xanthan Hydrogel.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Starch-Based Functional Ingredients in Baking: A Review of Advances in Starch Derivatives, Quality Enhancement, and Reduction of Fermentable Oligosaccharides, Disaccharides, Monosaccharides, and Polyols.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Germinated legumes for improving nutritional and technological quality of fortified cakes, with further enhancement using phospholipase and SSL.NPJ science of food · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The production of high-quality gluten-free pasta remains a persistent challenge, as it is the only effective dietary treatment for individuals with celiac disease. This study aimed to develop and evaluate high-protein gluten-free pasta (GFP) with acceptable quality. To increase GFP quality, response surface methodology (RSM) was employed to identify the optimal ratios of xanthan gum (XG) and guar gum (GG) as binding agents. The optimal concentrations of these hydrocolloids, determined as 2.00% XG and 0.75% GG, were used to formulate a GFP based on rice flour (RF), oat flour (OAF), and lentil flour (LF) at varying concentrations. The impacts of different formulations on pasting behavior and functional properties were assessed. The final products were evaluated for their physicochemical properties, hardness, phenolic content, protein digestibility, cooking quality, and sensory attributes. Notably, compared with RF, OAF resulted in a decreased peak viscosity (684.10 to 488.00 cP) and holding strength (548.90 to 357.60 cP), with a higher pasting temperature (59.10 to 63.40 °C) and breakdown (99.18 to 130 cP). LF negatively affected these parameters, which decreased proportionally with increasing LF replacement levels. Compared with RF, OAF resulted in significantly lower swelling power (6.88 to 4.96 g/g) and higher oil holding capacity (157 to 1.80 g/g). Higher LF levels reduce raw pasta hardness but positively impact the phenolic content and protein digestibility of cooked pasta. Sensory evaluations revealed that LF improved color, taste, and overall acceptability. This study contributes to the development of high-quality GFP, addressing both technological and nutritional challenges in gluten-free pasta production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.