ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
The I-PREDICT 50th Percentile Male Warfighter Finite Element Model: Development and Validation of the Head and Neck.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Modeling Fatigue and Damage Development in the Annulus Fibrosus Using a Reactive Viscoelastic Framework.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Military aviators are commonly exposed to scenarios that lead to pain and injury of the head and neck. Postmortem human subjects, human volunteer testing, and anthropomorphic test device experiments can provide useful information for injury risk assessments, but each method has limitations. Finite element human body models are a useful tool for assessing aviator injury risk and generating data that can be used to improve warfighter safety. This study details the head and neck development for such an HBM, the Incapacitation Prediction for Readiness in Expeditionary Domains: an Integrated Computational Tool (I-PREDICT), through a hierarchical framework. A total of 26 cases were included in the hierarchical validation. The validation framework began with identifying and implementing appropriate material models, assessments of functional spinal units (FSUs), progressing to the regional cervical spine and head, and culminated with assessments of the head-neck complex using the BioRank biofidelity scoring system. I-PREDICT FSUs had an overall excellent biofidelity score when assessed in extension, flexion, and tension. The head had an overall excellent biofidelity score when assessed with impacts to the frontal, maxilla, zygomatic, temporal, and parietal regions. The regional cervical spine had an overall good biofidelity score when assessed in compression, extension, flexion, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The head-neck complex had an overall good biofidelity score when assessed in tension, a head drop case, and a rear impact case. The current I-PREDICT model is designed for a 50th percentile male warfighter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40715643What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.