Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40715816›Full record

Trial reportNature medicine2025

Comparison of dual therapies for hypertension treatment in India: a randomized clinical trial.

Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Ambuj Roy, Ambalam M Chandrasekaran, Dimple Kondal, Somnath Mukherjee, Gaia Kiru, Kavita Singh, Hyndavi Salwa, Edmin Christa Sobitharaj, Ameeka Shereen Lobo and 27 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05683301 (Treatment Optimisation for Blood Pressure With Single-Pill Combinations in India), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05683301 phase4completednot on this map

Treatment Optimisation for Blood Pressure With Single-Pill Combinations in India

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre for Chronic Disease Control, IndiaRan2022 to 2024Enrolled1,981ConditionsPrimary HypertensionArmsAmlodipine + Perindopril, Perindopril + Indapamide, Amlodipine + Indapamide
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

37 authors.

Dorairaj Prabhakaran *Centre for Chronic Disease Control, New Delhi, India. dprabhakaran@ccdcindia.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3172-834X
Ambuj Roy *Department of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ambalam M ChandrasekaranCentre for Chronic Disease Control, New Delhi, India.
Dimple KondalCentre for Chronic Disease Control, New Delhi, India.
Somnath MukherjeeCentre for Chronic Disease Control, New Delhi, India.
Gaia KiruImperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Kavita SinghHeidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hyndavi SalwaCentre for Chronic Disease Control, New Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6916-1107
Edmin Christa SobitharajCentre for Chronic Disease Control, New Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1108-4444
Ameeka Shereen LoboCentre for Chronic Disease Control, New Delhi, India.
Gayatri MahajanCentre for Chronic Disease Control, New Delhi, India.
Bishav MohanDMC Heart Institute, Ludhiana, India.
Aman KhannaAman Hospital and Research Center, Vadodara, India.
Amit MalviyaNorth Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Shillong, India.
Satish G PatilShri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara University, Dharwad, India.
Vinod K AbichandaniRudraksh Hospital, Rudraksha Speciality Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.
Bhupinder SinghDepartment of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhatinda, India.
Bal Kishan GuptaDepartment of Medicine, S.P. Medical College and A.G. of Hospitals Bikaner, Bikaner, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3222-0011
Balsubramaiam YellapantulaShalinitai Meghe Hospital and Research Center, Nagpur, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1512-4412
Shailendra DandgeMediciti Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India.
Shantanu SenguptaSengupta Hospital and Research Institute, Nagpur, India.
Sunil KumarJSS Hospital, Mysuru, India.
Neil BardoloiApollo Excelcare Hospital, Guwahati, India.
Nagendra Boopathy SenguttuvanSri Ramchandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4979-596X
Rakesh Kumar SahayOsmania General Hospital, Hyderabad, India.
Suvarna PatilB.K.L. Walawalkar Rural Medical College, Sawarde, India.
Surender DeoraAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.
Rajpurohit PrahaladApollo Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India.
Vijaya Parthasaradhi SarvepalliApollo Hospitals DRDO, Hyderabad, India.
Justin Paul GnanarajMadras Medical College, Chennai, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8588-5594
Mallika KhannaAman Hospital and Research Center, Vadodara, India.
Animesh MishraNorth Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Shillong, India.
Kiran AithalShri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara University, Dharwad, India.
Vipul ChavdaRudraksh Hospital, Rudraksha Speciality Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6071-8282
Victoria R CorneliusImperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0080-1065
TOPSPIN Clinical Consortia
Neil R PoulterImperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

Imperial College London N/AServier (Laboratoires Servier) N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence is lacking for guiding optimal combination hypertension therapy in South Asian patients. Here we investigated the blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy and safety of three commonly recommended antihypertensive dual combinations in a multicenter, single-blinded trial conducted in India. We randomized Indians aged 30-79 years (mean age, 52 years) with mean sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 150-179 mmHg on no treatment or an SBP of 140-159 mmHg on monotherapy 1:1:1 to a single-pill combination of amlodipine-perindopril, perindopril-indapamide or amlodipine-indapamide. The primary outcome was the mean change in 24-hour ambulatory SBP at 6 months. Of the 1,981 participants (42% females) enrolled in the trial, 1,637 completed a 24-hour ambulatory BP measurement. All three drug combinations produced similar large reductions in the primary outcome, namely ambulatory (~14/8 mmHg) and office (~30/14 mmHg) BPs after 6 months, such that hypertension control rates (sitting BP < 140/90 mmHg) were achieved in approximately 70% of participants in all three groups. Furthermore, no significant differences in secondary outcomes, such as mean day and night ambulatory and office BPs and hypertension control rates, were observed among the study groups. Thus, in Indian patients, amlodipine-perindopril, perindopril-indapamide and amlodipine-indapamide were all equally well tolerated and equally highly effective in reducing 24-hour ambulatory and office BPs (ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT05683301 ).

Indexed as

AmlodipineAntihypertensive AgentsHypertensionIndapamidePerindoprilAdultAgedBlood PressureBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryDrug CombinationsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedAmlodipineAntihypertensive AgentsDrug CombinationsIndapamidePerindopril

Identifiers

PMID40715816
PMCPMC12443627

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.