ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Evaluation of a community-based remotely delivered exercise program (2Unstoppable Strong) for women diagnosed with cancer.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFew remote-delivered physical activity (PA) interventions leverage a community-academic partnership, which may impact sustainability. The current study aimed to assess the satisfaction with a community-based remote-delivered group-based PA program (2Unstoppable Strong) among women diagnosed with cancer and the preliminary impact of the intervention on exploratory outcomes (PA levels, perceived social support, exercise self-efficacy, barrier self-efficacy, and health-related quality of life).
methodsOnline questionnaires were administered at baseline (T0), post-program (T1), and follow-up (T2). Quantitative analyses included descriptive statistics and repeated measures analyses of variance. Open responses at the end of the questionnaire were used to identify areas of improvement. Content analysis was used to analyze the open response data.
resultsParticipants rated 2Unstoppable Strong as satisfactory (M
conclusionsBased on the promising findings, future hybrid implementation-effectiveness studies with larger and more-diverse populations are needed to examine the impact of 2Unstoppable Strong on cancer-related outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.