Trial reportApplied psychophysiology and biofeedback2026
Impact of a Single Alpha Neurofeedback Session on Working and Visuospatial Memory in Football Players: A Comparison of Defenders and Attackers.
Trial report in Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Working memory (WM) and visuospatial memory (VSM) are pivotal for rapid decision-making and effective teamwork in football. This study investigated the effects of a single-session alpha neurofeedback training (NFT) protocol at Pz on WM and VSM in 48 male players (aged 18-28), with a detailed analysis focusing on playing position, including both defenders and attackers, who were randomly assigned to either the NFT (n = 24) or sham (n = 24) groups. The NFT group received a 25-min eyes-closed session to boost Peak Alpha Frequency (PAF) (7.5-12.5 Hz), while the sham group received non-contingent feedback. WM was assessed using an n-back task, and VSM was measured via a Football Memory Block-Tapping Test (FMBT). The NFT group showed significantly greater improvements in NCR-L1, NCR-L2 (WM), and FRS (VSM) than the sham group (p < 0.05), whereas no significant differences were found in RTs during the WM task or in BRS during the VSM task (p > 0.05). Moreover, defenders outperformed attackers on certain WM and VSM measures, potentially reflecting the distinct demands of their positions. These findings suggest that even a brief alpha NFT session may enhance certain cognitive functions in football players, providing a practical and time-efficient approach that may contribute to improvements in memory performance, with variations observed across different positional roles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40715994What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.