ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2025
Optimizing Biomedical Health Efficiency: Unlocking the Full Potential of Life Science Innovation Through System Design.
Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- System changes to empower primary care in Alzheimer's disease detection and care.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Enhancing translational research impact through collaborative process innovation.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Major advances in biomedical science have transformed healthcare. However, system barriers to the appropriate, timely, and equitable use of biomedical innovations have led to slow and inconsistent adoption, limiting and delaying our ability to leverage their full potential to improve health. System barriers include inconsistent coverage, imperfect information systems for decision making and real word evidence, policy constraints, system capacity, social influences on health, and infrastructure gaps.We propose the development of an open access dynamic design "engine" to align biomedical and health system innovation. This engine will include coordinated collaborative design processes, frameworks, and tools, developed with input from all stakeholders, and centered around two critical, interdependent capabilities: (1) system design and (2) impact measurement. These capabilities will build capacity for efficient, model-driven design and implementation planning of sustainable, patient centered system innovations.The stakes are high for both the clinical promise of transformational products and their budget impact. Our current healthcare system is not ready to maximize benefit from transformational science and emerging biomedical innovations. We need to help the healthcare system catch up with the science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.