ArticleThe New phytologist2025
Warm temperature modifies cell fates to reduce stomata production in Arabidopsis.
Article in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stomatal abundance decrease in Arabidopsis triggered by warm temperature is attributed to PIF4-mediated repression of SPEECHLESS (SPCH) expression. We identified the unknown developmental and transcriptional basis of this adaptive response. We traced stomatal lineages in vivo using cell-identity marker lines and mutants, quantified epidermal traits, and conducted RNA sequencing under oscillating temperatures. Prolonged warm temperature or PIF4-overexpression altered cell fates, inducing diverted stomatal precursors (DPs) that lacked stomatal fate, contributing to stomata reduction. DPs originated from meristemoids that lost SPCH expression, lacked MUTE expression, and exited the cell cycle. Short warm-temperature pulses allowed later recovery of SPCH expression and did not induce DPs or stomata reduction. Comparison of transcriptomes obtained during warm-temperature pulses with stomatal lineage cell-specific profiles identified gene expression changes and contrasted their reversibility. Though at warm temperatures, key stomatal drivers were downregulated, most lineages formed stomata through partly modified transcriptional landscapes that promoted uncommitted cell identities and could include noncanonical pathways. Expression changes in stomatal regulators and cell-fate changes explain lineage progression under fluctuating temperatures. Since short-term temperature oscillations prevail in natural conditions, the requirement of long warm-temperature exposure to trigger DPs would prevent stomata reduction by occasional temperature rises. Promoting uncommitted lineage stages provides flexibility to stomatal development under environmental changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.