ArticleRisk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis2025
Mental health risks of pandemic-related media communication: The mediating roles of distinct types of perceived threat.
Article in Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and Correlates of Depressive Symptoms in Canada During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Based on 144 Studies Including 406,043 Participants: Prévalence et corrélats des symptômes dépressifs au Canada pendant la pandémie de COVID-19 : revue systématique et méta-analyse de 144 études comprenant 406 043 participants.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2026Review
- Mental health risks of pandemic-related media communication: The mediating roles of distinct types of perceived threat.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research has shown that constant exposure to health crisis-related information can negatively affect individuals' mental health. Using data from a two-wave panel survey of German citizens (n = 1162) conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, this study aims to examine whether and how the relationship between people's media exposure and mental health is mediated through distinct types of perceived threat. The results show that perceived threat posed by the virus (perceived health threat) and perceived threat regarding the consequences of governmental antipandemic measures (such as lockdowns) for personal freedom (perceived political threat) mediated media effects on depressive symptoms. However, the effects differed significantly depending on the type of information source. While more frequent exposure to high-quality traditional news media (public broadcasters, national newspapers and magazines, and local and regional newspapers) positively affected depressive symptoms mediated by perceived health threat, the use of low-quality traditional news media (private broadcasters and tabloids) and social media platforms did this mediated by perceived political threat. By providing a nuanced account of the relationship between media exposure, perceived threat, and mental health during times of a major health crisis, this study offers practical insights into how harmful effects of health crisis risk communication could be mitigated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.