ArticleRenal failure2025
Machine learning to predict postdialysis fatigue in patients undergoing hemodialysis.
Article in Renal failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of an inflammatory index-based interpretable machine learning model for mortality risk stratification in hemodialysis patients.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Prediction of Imminent Peritoneal Dialysis-Associated Peritonitis Using Time-Updated Electronic Health Records and Machine Learning: A Temporal Validation Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Article
- Global prevalence of poor sleep quality in hemodialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence, machine learning, telemedicine, and digital transformation in nephrology and transplantation.Renal failure · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMachine learning (ML) has been widely used to predict complications and prognosis in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). However, accurate and efficient models for predicting postdialysis fatigue (PDF) in this population are still needed because PDF is surprisingly prevalent.
aimsThis study aimed to explore the potential of ML models for predicting PDF in patients undergoing HD. DATA SOURCES: A total of 1,281 Chinese patients undergoing HD from six tertiary hospitals (65.26% male, mean age = 54.48 years).
designCross-sectional study.
methodsSeven ML models were compared: Logistic regression (LR), Decision tree (DT), Random forests (RF), LightGBM (LGBM), CatBoost, XGBoost (XGB), and Gradient boosting tree (GBT), to predict the PDF and identify variables with predictive value based on the best-performing model among Chinese patients undergoing HD. The study findings were reported in accordance with the TRIPOD+AI guidelines.
resultsThe RF model achieved the relatively optimal and stable performance, with an area under the curve of 0.855, accuracy of 0.773, F1 score of 0.769, and Brier score of 0.155 in test set. Resilience, appetite, potassium levels, sleep quality, constipation, history of fistula surgery, diastolic blood bressure, and the category of "combined other diseases" were the strongest predictors of PDF.
conclusionML models can serve as convenient screening and assessment tools for PDF risk in Chinese patients undergoing HD. In combination with the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach, the proposed framework provides a more intuitive and comprehensive interpretation of the predictive model, thereby allowing clinicians to better understand the decision-making process of the model and impact of the factors associated with PDF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.