Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40717040›Full record

ReviewCommunity dentistry and oral epidemiology2025

The Political Determinants of Oral Health Inequalities: Lessons in Policy Development and Implementation From Six Case Studies.

Stefan T Serban, Sandra Perdomo, Aida Borges-Yañez, Finbarr Allen, Carol Guarnizo-Herreño, María Kamila Navarro-Ramírez, Matt Hobbs, Lois K Cohen, Georgios Tsakos, Sarah R Baker and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Community dentistry and oral epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Stefan T SerbanSchool of Medicine, Dentistry, and Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7911-688X
Sandra PerdomoGenomic Epidemiology Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organisation, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7740-8141
Aida Borges-YañezFacultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-4924-8616
Finbarr AllenCork Dental School & Hospital, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Carol Guarnizo-HerreñoFacultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-8781-2671
María Kamila Navarro-RamírezFacultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-7451-6155
Matt HobbsFaculty of Health, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-8398-7485
Lois K CohenLois K. Cohen and Associates LLC, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9358-4636
Georgios TsakosDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5086-235X
Sarah R BakerLincoln Institute for Rural and Coastal Health, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2861-451X
David I ConwaySchool of Medicine, Dentistry, and Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7762-4063

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOral diseases are the most prevalent diseases globally, affecting almost half of the world's population with a disproportionate burden on the most vulnerable groups. Despite growing attention on the social and commercial determinants of health, there is still a largely unexplored area in understanding the political determinants of health and oral health. The aim of this paper is to describe national policy development processes for policies impacting population oral health.

methodsA multiple case study approach was used to analyse six case studies focused on national policy development processes targeting oral health. Kingdon's Multiple Streams Model was used to examine how problems, policy solutions, and political factors aligned to influence policymaking.

resultsSome of the most common barriers to policy adoption and implementation were misinformation strategies, legal challenges, industry lobbying, ideological opposition to state intervention, and lack of transparency regarding conflicts of interest. Important common facilitators included robust scientific evidence presented in an accessible manner to the appropriate audiences, identification of key decision-makers, support from parties from across the political spectrum, intersectoral collaboration, and ongoing policy monitoring and evaluation.

conclusionsThis study provides novel insights into how political determinants influence social and commercial determinants of health, demonstrating how political contexts and power dynamics shape national public health policy development processes. Understanding these dynamics is essential for ensuring that evidence-based public health interventions are politically feasible and resilient to opposition from certain private industry and ideological interests. In a time of growing inequalities, neutrality in the face of structural injustice risks entrenching a status quo that favours those with the greatest influence. To address these problems sustainably, public health practitioners must recognise and engage with the political nature of policymaking.

Indexed as

Health PolicyHealth Status DisparitiesOral HealthPolicy MakingPoliticsSocial Determinants of HealthHumanshealth inequitieshealth policyoral healthpolicy analysissocial determinants of healthstructural determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID40717040
PMCPMC12423355

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.