Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40717285›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2025

A conceptual framework for human-AI collaborative genome annotation.

Xiaomei Li, Alex Whan, Meredith McNeil, David Starns, Jessica Irons, Samuel C Andrew, Rad Suchecki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaomei LiAgriculture and Food, CSIRO, 26 Pembroke Road, Marsfield, NSW 2122, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8870-3186
Alex WhanAgriculture and Food, CSIRO, 2-40 Clunies Ross Street, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6839-2915
Meredith McNeilAgriculture and Food, CSIRO, 306 Carmody Road, St Lucia, QLD 4067, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4671-7210
David StarnsSchool of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6583-9067
Jessica IronsData 61, CSIRO, 13 Garden Street, Eveleigh, NSW 2015, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0671-5168
Samuel C AndrewAgriculture and Food, CSIRO, 26 Pembroke Road, Marsfield, NSW 2122, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4589-2746
Rad SucheckiAgriculture and Food, CSIRO, 40 Waite Road, Urrbrae, SA 5064, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4992-9497

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome annotation is essential for understanding the functional elements within genomes. While automated methods are indispensable for processing large-scale genomic data, they often face challenges in accurately predicting gene structures and functions. Consequently, manual curation by domain experts remains crucial for validating and refining these predictions. These combined outcomes from automated tools and manual curation highlight the importance of integrating human expertise with artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities to improve both the accuracy and efficiency of genome annotation. However, the manual curation process is inherently labor-intensive and time-consuming, making it difficult to scale for large datasets. To address these challenges, we propose a conceptual framework, Human-AI Collaborative Genome Annotation (HAICoGA), that leverages the synergistic partnership between humans and AI to enhance human capabilities and accelerate the genome annotation process. Additionally, we explore the potential of integrating large language models into this framework to support and augment specific tasks. Finally, we discuss emerging challenges and outline open research questions to guide further exploration in this area.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceGenome, HumanGenomicsMolecular Sequence AnnotationComputational BiologyHumansartificial intelligencecollaborationconceptual frameworkgenome annotationhumanlarge language model

Identifiers

PMID40717285
PMCPMC12301185

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.