ArticleHeart rhythm O22025
Phasic effects of cardiac-synchronized vagus nerve stimulation on spatiotemporal behavior of the sinoatrial node in swine.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Recent clinical trials of cervical vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in heart failure patients failed to demonstrate the expected benefits seen in experimental studies, potentially due to subtherapeutic VNS levels. The timing and burst firing of VNS affects cardiac cycle length (CL) prolongation and the shift of the sinoatrial node (SAN) from a superior to inferior position in mammals, including humans. Objective: The study sought to determine if parasympathetic nerves of swine respond in a similar manner to other studies in mammals. Methods: Seven pigs were anesthetized using isoflurane for surgical instrumentation before the study. Once completed, the anesthesia was switched to α-chloralose. Cardiac-synchronized VNS was performed in bursts for 10 to 20 cardiac cycles. The synchronization of the bursts varied by 100-ms increments following sensed atrial depolarization. Epicardial mapping was performed to characterize the spatiotemporal behavior of the SAN during VNS in 6 of 7 animals. Results: The average cardiac CL before VNS was 517 ± 73 ms. Altering the synchronized delay of the VNS resulted in CL prolongations (range 16 ± 6% to 27 ± 18%) in pigs, similar to those observed in other mammals. Interestingly, the SAN shifted inferiorly in only 2 of 6 mapped animals during VNS regardless of the extent of CL prolongation. These shift sites, the superior SAN and inferior SAN, alternated between the 2 locations as the CL changed. Conclusion: The temporal behavior of the SAN during cardiac-synchronized VNS in swine is similar to that observed in other mammals, but its spatial behavior is different. Because burst firing of VNS is physiological, future work in swine on its effect on mitigating heart failure should be studied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.