Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40717873›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Comprehensive Review and Evidence-Based Treatment Framework for Optimizing Plantar Fasciitis Diagnosis and Management.

Tonyclinton C Nweke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tonyclinton C NwekePodiatric Surgery, Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plantar fasciitis, a prevalent cause of heel pain, results from inflammation of the plantar fascia, often due to repetitive stress and overuse. This comprehensive review and evidence-based treatment framework for optimizing plantar fasciitis diagnosis and management aims to inform podiatric surgeons (foot and ankle surgeons), primary care physicians, orthopedic surgeons, physical therapists, sports medicine specialists, and other medical practitioners. Developed through a literature review from mostly 2020 to 2025 using PubMed and Cochrane, this framework integrates high-quality evidence in the pathophysiology and treatment of plantar fasciitis. Diagnosis relies on detailed patient history, physical examination (including palpation, windlass test, and heel squeeze test), and selective imaging (X-rays, ultrasound, or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)) to confirm plantar fasciitis and rule out differentials such as tarsal tunnel syndrome or calcaneal stress fractures. A four-phase plantar fasciitis treatment framework categorizes 30 plantar fasciitis treatments into initial therapies, intermediate therapies, specialized therapies, and last-resort surgical therapies. Initial therapies (e.g., Rest, Ice, Compression, Elevation (RICE), stretching, orthotics) focus on early symptom relief, while intermediate (e.g., photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT), extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT)) and specialized therapies (e.g., platelet-rich plasma (PRP), dry needling) address persistent cases. Surgical options like endoscopic plantar fascia release are reserved for recalcitrant cases. Recommendations prioritize low-risk, high-efficacy interventions, progressing to invasive treatments only when necessary, ensuring tailored management to optimize patient outcomes and minimize complications.

Indexed as

clinical practice guidelines (cpg)evidence based treatmentheel paininitial therapiesintermediate therapiesplantar fasciaplantar fasciitisspecialised therapiessurgical therapies

Identifiers

PMID40717873
PMCPMC12294660

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.