Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40718064›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2025

Elisabeth Tawa, Daniel Notterman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neuroproteomic Profiling of the Anxiolytic Potential ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elisabeth TawaPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States.
Daniel NottermanDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex differences are observed in several neurologic and psychiatric disorders. Many aberrant behavioral symptoms can be characterized clinically as either internalizing or externalizing, which tend to manifest disproportionately in females or males, respectively. Stress may precipitate or amplify these behavioral disturbances, which often start in childhood and adolescence but persist into adulthood. Increased understanding of sex differences in stress-induced behavioral changes and their underlying molecular mechanisms is integral to developing better therapeutics specifically tailored to males and females. Here, we highlight the potential of

Indexed as

cellular and molecularDrosophilasex differencessocial isolationstress

Identifiers

PMID40718064
PMCPMC12289588

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.