ReviewBurns & trauma2025
Exploring machine learning strategies for single-cell transcriptomic analysis in wound healing.
Review in Burns & trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancements in Functional Polymeric Scaffolds for Scar-Free Skin Regeneration.Polymer science & technology (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- HMHLVI: Hybrid Multi-view Hypergraph Learning with Variational Inference for snoRNA-Drug Association Prediction.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026Article
- Review
- Precision immunopharmacology in peri-implantitis management: from molecular mechanisms to advanced therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Combined Use of Aqueous Extracts and Polysaccharides from Angelica sinensis and Platycladus orientalis Treats Androgenetic Alopecia.Plant foods for human nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- A machine learning framework using urinary biomarkers for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma prediction with post hoc validation via single-cell transcriptomics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Betanin Promotes Wound Closure and Drives a Context-Specific Transcriptional Repair Program in HaCaT Keratinocytes: A Multi-Evidence AI-Guided Prioritization Study.BioFactors (Oxford, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wound healing is a highly orchestrated, multiphase process that involves various cell types and molecular pathways. Recent advances in single-cell transcriptomics and machine learning have provided unprecedented insights into the complexity of this process, enabling the identification of novel cellular subpopulations and molecular mechanisms underlying tissue repair. In particular, single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has revealed significant cellular heterogeneity, especially within fibroblast populations, and has provided valuable information on immune cell dynamics during healing. Machine learning algorithms have enhanced data analysis by improving cell clustering, dimensionality reduction, and trajectory inference, leading to a better understanding of wound healing at the single-cell level. This review synthesizes the latest findings on the application of scRNA-seq and machine learning in wound healing research, with a focus on fibroblast diversity, immune responses, and spatial organization of cells. The integration of these technologies has the potential to revolutionize therapeutic strategies for chronic wounds, fibrosis, and tissue regeneration, offering new opportunities for precision medicine. By combining computational approaches with biological insights, this review highlights the transformative impact of scRNA-seq and machine learning on wound healing research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.