Evidence mapPaperPMID 40719638Full record

Trial reportCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring as a Biological Feedback Strategy to Motivate Physical Activity in Cancer Survivors: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study.

Yue Liao, Grace E Brannon, Chad D Rethorst, Miranda Baum, Therese B Bevers, Susan M Schembre, Karen M Basen-Engquist

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05124405 (Monitoring Your Exercise-related Metrics Over Time Via Wearable Electronic Devices), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05124405 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Monitoring Your Exercise-related Metrics Over Time Via Wearable Electronic Devices

TypeinterventionalSponsorM.D. Anderson Cancer CenterRan2018 to 2027Enrolled35ConditionsCancer, DiabetesArmsFitbit, Continuous Glucose Monitor
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yue LiaoDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9384-336X
Grace E BrannonDepartment of Communication, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1116-9015
Chad D RethorstTexas A&M AgriLife Institute for Advancing Health Through Agriculture, Dallas, TX, USA.
Miranda BaumDepartment of Health Disparities Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Therese B BeversDepartment of Clinical Cancer Prevention, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6006-3108
Susan M SchembreGeorgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Karen M Basen-EngquistDepartment of Health Disparities Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionIdentifying novel strategies to motivate regular physical activity in cancer survivors continues to be a critical mission, as the majority of cancer survivors are not sufficiently active to achieve the many health benefits of being regularly physically active. Providing biological feedback is one of the behavioral change techniques that shows promising effects in physical activity interventions. This study used a mixed-methods approach to test the acceptability and changes in physical activity motivation of a pilot intervention that provided personalized feedback via text messaging based on data from an activity tracker (Fitbit) and continuous glucose monitor (CGM) over a 4-week period.MethodsTwelve breast and colorectal cancer survivors completed this pilot intervention, which involved a one-on-one educational session followed by a 4-week intervention period with a Fitbit wristband and CGM. They received 2-3 weekly text messages based on their Fitbit and CGM data that aimed to increase their motivation to engage in physical activity. Participants completed surveys assessing motivational readiness before and after the intervention, and a post-intervention survey that assessed acceptability of the intervention. Exit interview was also conducted to collect their feedback and opinions toward the intervention.ResultsBoth quantitative and qualitative results suggest a high acceptability of the study devices (ie, Fitbit and CGM) as well as the intervention components (e.g., the glucose-based biological feedback). Participants reported a significant decrease in the preparation stage and an increase in the action and maintenance stages (ps < 0.05). Results from qualitative analysis further indicate participants' positive changes in physical activity motivations.ConclusionThe use of CGM along with an activity tracker is a viable method to provide personally relevant and motivating biological feedback messages to motivate physical activity in cancer survivors. Future studies can incorporate this behavior change technique into their intervention and further evaluate its impact on behavior change and related health outcomes.Clinical trial number: NCT05124405.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringBreast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsColorectal NeoplasmsExerciseMotivationAdultAgedContinuous Glucose MonitoringFemaleFitness TrackersHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsBlood Glucosebehavioral interventionbiosensorcancer survivorshipdigital healthmHealth

Identifiers

PMID40719638
PMCPMC12304624

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.