Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40719904›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2025

Machine learning-based prediction of nitrogen-fixing efficiency in Cowpea rhizobia from the Brazilian semiarid.

Jardel da Silva Souza, Adriana Ferreira Martins, Flávio Pereira de Oliveira, Sandra Helena Unêda-Trevisoli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jardel da Silva SouzaFaculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, SP, Brasil. jardel.souza@unesp.br.
Adriana Ferreira MartinsCenter for Agricultural Sciences, Federal University of Paraíba, Areia, PB, Brasil.
Flávio Pereira de OliveiraCenter for Agricultural Sciences, Federal University of Paraíba, Areia, PB, Brasil.
Sandra Helena Unêda-TrevisoliFaculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, SP, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explores the potential of machine learning to predict nitrogen fixation efficiency in rhizobia strains associated with cowpea (Vigna unguiculata), aiming to optimize bioinoculant selection for sustainable agriculture. Eight native strains were isolated from soils in the Brejo Paraibano region (Brazil), characterized morphologically on Yeast Mannitol Agar YMA medium, and evaluated in greenhouse bioassays for nitrogen accumulation and Relative Index of Nitrogen Fixation Efficiency (IRF%). A Ridge Regression model was then developed using phenotypic colony traits as predictors to estimate Total Nitrogen and IRF%. The results demonstrated strong correlations between predicted and actual values (r = 0.95-0.96), suggesting that visible colony characteristics can serve as reliable proxies for strain efficiency. This approach has the potential to offer a cost-effective alternative to traditional greenhouse trials, with indications of reduced time and resource demands. However, these results are theoretical and require validation through larger datasets and field conditions before broad application in sustainable agriculture can be considered.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNitrogen FixationRhizobiumVignaBrazilNitrogenSoil MicrobiologyNitrogenBioinoculantsMachine learningNitrogen fixationPhenotypic characterizationRhizobiumSemi-arid regionsSustainable agriculture

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.