Evidence mapPaperPMID 40720110Full record

Trial reportJAMA internal medicine2025

Nurse-Led Family Support Intervention for Families of Critically Ill Patients: The FICUS Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Rahel Naef, Marie-Madlen Jeitziner, Marco Riguzzi, Stefanie von Felten, Lotte Verweij, Michael Rufer, Judith Safford, Simone Sutter, Bettina Bergmann-Kipfer, Ursula Betschart and 26 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05280691 (A Multi-center, Cluster Randomized Superiority Trial of a Guideline-based Family Support Intervention in Intensive Care Units), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05280691 nacompletednot on this map

A Multi-center, Cluster Randomized Superiority Trial of a Guideline-based Family Support Intervention in Intensive Care Units

TypeinterventionalSponsorRahel NaefRan2022 to 2025Enrolled885ConditionsPostintensive Care Syndrome, Family Members, Quality of Life, Depression, AnxietyArmsFamily Support Intervention (FSI)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. ICU communication: 'state of the art'.Intensive care medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors.

Rahel NaefInstitute for Implementation Science in Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Marie-Madlen JeitzinerDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Marco RiguzziInstitute for Implementation Science in Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Stefanie von FeltenDepartment of Biostatistics at Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Lotte VerweijInstitute for Implementation Science in Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Michael RuferCenter for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Clinic Zugersee, Oberwil-Zug, Switzerland.
Judith SaffordPatient Research Partner, Bern, Switzerland.
Simone SutterInstitute for Implementation Science in Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Bettina Bergmann-KipferIntensive Care Unit, Hospital of Thun, Thun, Switzerland.
Ursula BetschartDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, HOCH Health Ostschweiz, Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland.
Sabina BoltshauserDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Spital Thurgau Frauenfeld, Frauenfeld, Switzerland.
Nadine BrülisauerIntensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesia, Emergency, Intensive Care and Rescue, Cantonal Hospital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland.
Christoph BrunnerDivision of Perioperative Intensive Care Medicine, HOCH Health Ostschweiz, Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland.
Philipp Karl BühlerCenter of Intensive Care Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Hanna BurkhalterDepartment of Nursing and Specialist Support, Nursing Development, Cantonal Hospital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland.
Alexander DullenkopfInstitute for Anesthesia, Spital Thurgau Frauenfeld, Frauenfeld, Switzerland.
Antje HeiseIntensive Care Unit, Hospital of Thun, Thun, Switzerland.
Benjamin HertlerInstitute of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Johanna Elisabeth HoffmannNursing Development and Quality Unit, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Luzern, Switzerland.
Carmen KardeInstitute of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Yvonne KellerNurse Development Department, Cantonal Hospital Baden, Baden, Switzerland.
Susanne KohlerInstitute of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Fabienne LussmannCenter of Intensive Care Medicine, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Luzern, Switzerland.
Paola MassarottoInstitute of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Michaela MoserInterdisciplinary Intensive Care Unit, Department of Perioperative Medicine, Solothurn Hospitals AG, Cantonal Hospital Olten, Olten, Switzerland.
Urs PietschDivision of Perioperative Intensive Care Medicine, HOCH Health Ostschweiz, Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland.
Diana Livia SegaladaCenter of Intensive Care Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Esther SiegristInstitute of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Peter SteigerInstitute of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Naira RuchDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Christoph von DachDepartment of Nursing, Solothurn Hospitals AG, Solothurn, Switzerland.
Monique Seraina WenzlerInstitute for Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Hirslanden Clinic Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jan WiegandIntensive Care Unit, Lindenhofgruppe, Lindenhofspital, Bern, Switzerland.
Bjoern ZanteDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Miodrag FilipovicDivision of Perioperative Intensive Care Medicine, HOCH Health Ostschweiz, Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland.
FICUS Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Among families of patients treated in intensive care units (ICUs), insufficient communication and support may increase family distress that can lead to adverse health outcomes. Family-focused care is recommended, but high-quality experimental research is lacking. Objective: To determine whether a nurse-led, interprofessional, multicomponent family support intervention improves family satisfaction, communication quality, and support to families. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study was a multicenter, cluster-randomized clinical trial with 1:1 allocation of ICUs using minimization. Family members of critically ill patients who were treated for at least 48 hours at 16 adult ICUs in 12 hospitals in Switzerland were enrolled between May 2022 and January 2024. The first follow-up after patient ICU discharge was completed in February 2024. Data of all participants were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models, with the individual as the unit of inference. Intervention: Intervention ICUs implemented a novel family nurse role that engaged and liaised with families, offered relationship-focused, psychoeducational support, and ensured interprofessional communication along the ICU trajectory. Control ICUs continued with usual care. Main outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the family satisfaction with ICU care through the Family Satisfaction with ICU survey (range, 0-100), assessed after patient ICU discharge. Secondary outcomes included the quality of family-clinician communication, measured by the Questionnaire on Quality of Physician-Patient Interaction (range, 1-5), and cognitive and emotional support, assessed by the Family Perceived Support Questionnaire (range, 14-70). Results: Of 2057 consecutively invited family members, 412 were enrolled in the intervention and 473 in the control arm (median age, 54 [IQR, 42-65] years; 429 partners [48%]; and 568 women [64%]). The intervention improved overall family satisfaction with ICU care by a mean difference (MD) between groups of 2.39 (95% CI, 0.31-4.47; P = .02). Sensitivity analyses adjusting for cluster- and individual-level characteristics in combination with multiple imputation confirmed this result. Satisfaction with involvement in decision-making was more strongly increased than satisfaction with care. Furthermore, the intervention improved communication (MD, 0.37; 95% CI; 0.16-0.58; P = .002), and cognitive and emotional support (MD, 8.71; 95% CI, 4.71-12.71, P < .001). Conclusions and relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that a nurse-led, interprofessional family support intervention in ICU had a small, statistically significant, but clinically uncertain benefit on family satisfaction, and relevantly improved quality of communication and cognitive/emotional support of family. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05280691.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessFamilyProfessional-Family RelationsSocial SupportAdultAgedCommunicationFamily SupportFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedSwitzerland

Identifiers

PMID40720110
PMCPMC12558129

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.