Trial reportJAMA internal medicine2025
Nurse-Led Family Support Intervention for Families of Critically Ill Patients: The FICUS Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05280691 (A Multi-center, Cluster Randomized Superiority Trial of a Guideline-based Family Support Intervention in Intensive Care Units), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multi-center, Cluster Randomized Superiority Trial of a Guideline-based Family Support Intervention in Intensive Care Units
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- The FICUS cluster randomized controlled trial of a family support intervention in adult intensive care units: mental health and family functioning outcomes.Intensive care medicine · 2026Trial
- Family support in intensive care: beyond no effect trials and the hidden challenges of cluster randomization.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- ICU communication: 'state of the art'.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- [Complex family interventions in intensive care units: state of knowledge and future directions].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026Review
- Family-administered delirium screening improves satisfaction among ICU caregivers: a prospective cohort study.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Awake patients' experiences and coping needs during awake prone positioning in general wards: a patient-perspective qualitative study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
36 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Among families of patients treated in intensive care units (ICUs), insufficient communication and support may increase family distress that can lead to adverse health outcomes. Family-focused care is recommended, but high-quality experimental research is lacking. Objective: To determine whether a nurse-led, interprofessional, multicomponent family support intervention improves family satisfaction, communication quality, and support to families. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study was a multicenter, cluster-randomized clinical trial with 1:1 allocation of ICUs using minimization. Family members of critically ill patients who were treated for at least 48 hours at 16 adult ICUs in 12 hospitals in Switzerland were enrolled between May 2022 and January 2024. The first follow-up after patient ICU discharge was completed in February 2024. Data of all participants were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models, with the individual as the unit of inference. Intervention: Intervention ICUs implemented a novel family nurse role that engaged and liaised with families, offered relationship-focused, psychoeducational support, and ensured interprofessional communication along the ICU trajectory. Control ICUs continued with usual care. Main outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the family satisfaction with ICU care through the Family Satisfaction with ICU survey (range, 0-100), assessed after patient ICU discharge. Secondary outcomes included the quality of family-clinician communication, measured by the Questionnaire on Quality of Physician-Patient Interaction (range, 1-5), and cognitive and emotional support, assessed by the Family Perceived Support Questionnaire (range, 14-70). Results: Of 2057 consecutively invited family members, 412 were enrolled in the intervention and 473 in the control arm (median age, 54 [IQR, 42-65] years; 429 partners [48%]; and 568 women [64%]). The intervention improved overall family satisfaction with ICU care by a mean difference (MD) between groups of 2.39 (95% CI, 0.31-4.47; P = .02). Sensitivity analyses adjusting for cluster- and individual-level characteristics in combination with multiple imputation confirmed this result. Satisfaction with involvement in decision-making was more strongly increased than satisfaction with care. Furthermore, the intervention improved communication (MD, 0.37; 95% CI; 0.16-0.58; P = .002), and cognitive and emotional support (MD, 8.71; 95% CI, 4.71-12.71, P < .001). Conclusions and relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that a nurse-led, interprofessional family support intervention in ICU had a small, statistically significant, but clinically uncertain benefit on family satisfaction, and relevantly improved quality of communication and cognitive/emotional support of family. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05280691.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.