Observational studyPloS one2025
Identification of risk factors and development of a predictive model in patients using cefmetazole for international normalized ratio elevation.
Observational study in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient risk factors related to coagulopathy and bleeding when using cefmetazole (CMZ) have not yet been identified, and no models exist to predict side effects during CMZ treatment. Moreover, reports that examine which patients should be careful when using CMZ to ensure safety are lacking. Our objective was to understand risk factors for elevated international normalized ratio (INR) in patients using CMZ and to develop a predictive model for INR elevation using a risk score to enable safe administration of CMZ. This multicenter, retrospective, and observational study was conducted in Tokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Medical Center and Keio University Hospital using data from patients being treated with CMZ. Patients were classified into INR-elevated or non-INR-elevated groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to calculate the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The actual probability of an elevated INR and probability of an elevated INR predicted by the regression β coefficients were calculated and classified into four categories according to the risk score. Binomial logistic regression analysis revealed that liver disorder (aOR, 5.65; 95% CI, 1.69-18.91; risk scores, 2), nutritional risk (aOR, 6.32; 95% CI, 3.14-12.74; risk scores, 2), no-diabetes mellitus (aOR, 4.53; 95% CI, 1.34-15.26; risk scores, 2), and warfarin use (aOR, 98.44; 95% CI, 7.05-1375.50; risk scores, 5) were significantly associated with INR elevation. The predicted incidence probabilities of INR elevation were < 5% (low risk), 5- < 30% (medium risk), 30- < 90% (high risk), and ≥ 90% (very high risk). The model validity showed a good fit (AUC, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.73-0.85, P < 0.001). We identified risk factors that contribute to INR elevation and constructed a model to predict INR elevation using the risk score. Using this predictive model enables the appropriate use of CMZ in a safe manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.