ArticleAnnals of family medicine2025
Diabetes Care Delivery and Outcomes by Race and Ethnicity: Evaluation of an Enhanced Primary Care Practice Model in the US Upper Midwest.
Article in Annals of family medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe Enhanced Primary Care Diabetes (EPCD) model is nurse led and leverages interdisciplinary support to improve diabetes quality indicators. The model has been found to be effective overall; however, because narrowing health disparities is a key objective, we aimed to assess differential effectiveness of the model among various racial and ethnic groups.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study compared the time to meeting the D5, a publicly reported quality measure (composite indicator of glycemic and blood pressure control, aspirin use for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease, statin use, and documented abstinence from tobacco use), after enrollment in the EPCD program by Black, Hispanic/Latine, and Asian patients compared with White patients with diabetes (age 18-75 years) receiving care at 13 primary care practices by multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Patients enrolled in the program from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020; the study period end date was August 1, 2022.
resultsThe EPCD program enrolled 1,749 patients (none of whom met the D5 at entry) and 1,061 (60.7%) met the D5 during the study period. Black patients were less likely to meet the D5 compared with White patients (adjusted hazard ratio 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52-0.90;
conclusionsTime to meeting the D5 was longer for Black patients compared with White patients in the EPCD model, despite greater engagement with the care team. Further research is needed to identify factors driving these disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.