Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40722182›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2025

Missense variants in PRKCD: elucidating their potential association with breast cancer.

Sameen Zafar, Yasmin Badshah, Maria Shabbir, Uzma Mussarat, Asma Latif, Janeen H Trembley, Tayyaba Afsar, Fohad Mabood Husain, Suhail Razak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sameen ZafarDepartment of Bioscience, Atta-ur-Rahman School of Applied Biosciences (ASAB), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan.
Yasmin BadshahDepartment of Bioscience, Atta-ur-Rahman School of Applied Biosciences (ASAB), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan.
Maria ShabbirDepartment of Bioscience, Atta-ur-Rahman School of Applied Biosciences (ASAB), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan.
Uzma MussaratDepartment of Pathology (Microbiology), Islamic International Medical College, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Asma LatifAnimal Health Program, Animal Science Institute, National Agriculture Research Center, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Janeen H TrembleyDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Tayyaba AfsarDepartment of Community Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fohad Mabood HusainDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11433, Saudi Arabia.
Suhail RazakDepartment of Community Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. smarazi@ksu.edu.sa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMissense single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in various genetic pathways can lead to the development of breast cancer. Protein kinase C delta (PRKCD) is involved in various important cellular pathways, and its altered expression has been identified in different cancers. Genetic alteration in this gene can be involved in cancer onset and progression. To date, there are no studies performed to elucidate the role of PRKCD missense variants in the development of breast cancer. Therefore, this study aims to identify the association of pathogenic missense SNPs in PRKCD with breast cancer.

methodsThe missense variants of PRKCD were retrieved from the Ensembl and dbSNP databases. Missense variants were analysed through various computational tools, and four variants of PRKCD rs1703806197 (T/C), rs782555227 (G/A), rs1703449438 (T/C), and rs1575535582 (T/G) were selected from the data. The genotype analysis for these variants was performed for 360 breast cancer patients and 363 healthy controls. Statistical association of variants with breast cancer clinical features was determined through chi-square/Fisher's exact test with a significant P value ≤ 0.05 using GraphPad Prism 8.0 software.

resultsGenotype analysis of PRKCD variants showed that missense SNPs rs782555227 (G/A), rs1703449438 (T/C), and rs1575535582 (T/G) were associated with breast cancer (P value < 0.05). Furthermore, genotypes in these SNPs were also found to be associated with various clinical features of breast cancer patients. Genotypes AG, TC, and TT in variants rs782555227, rs1703449438, and rs1575535582, respectively, were associated with breast cancer metastasis. While genotype AG of variant rs782555227 was also found to be associated with menopausal status and hereditary breast cancer. Moreover, genotype TT in variant rs1575535582 was associated with BRCA1 positive status among the breast cancer patients.

conclusionThe present study identified for the first time the association of specific PRKCD missense variants with breast cancer. These variants could be developed into possible genetic markers for the diagnosis of breast cancer at an early stage; however, further validation studies with a multiethnic large cohort size are required. Furthermore, functional studies of these variants will also aid in attaining insight into the molecular mechanisms through which these missense variants are involved in breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseMutation, MissensePolymorphism, Single NucleotideProtein Kinase C-deltaAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleGenotypeHumansMiddle AgedPRKCD protein, humanProtein Kinase C-delta

Identifiers

PMID40722182
PMCPMC12305980

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.