ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
A composite measurement concept for monitoring cardiac function in Fabry disease.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring a plasma proteomic biosignature associated with cardiac involvement in Fabry disease.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFabry disease (FD) is an X-linked, multisystemic, progressive lysosomal disorder caused by GLA variants resulting in alpha-galactosidase A deficiency. Although cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in people with FD, the progression of cardiac dysfunction remains poorly understood, mainly due to a lack of clinical measurement tools for predicting cardiac progression risk over relevant timescales. New, accessible tools are needed to measure cardiac functional change and predict event risk over shorter timescales. Digital tools allow at-home, frequent data collection that could help detect elevated cardiac event risk, inform treatment and management, and support novel therapy development. Digital measures are designed, developed, and validated using recognized frameworks. We present a novel composite measurement concept aligned to established guidance that utilizes digital tools to improve the monitoring of cardiac function in FD.
methodsA targeted literature search, patient advisory board, and clinician advisory board were conducted to identify important FD signs and symptoms and the most suitable cardiac patient-reported outcomes and digital tools for concurrent remote collection of subjective and objective data.
resultsThe literature search highlighted a lack of FD-specific cardiac digital monitoring tools. Patient advisory board discussions and survey responses highlighted pain, gastrointestinal issues, and fatigue as important FD symptoms, and participants expressed a desire to understand how cardiac manifestations impacted these symptoms. The clinician advisory board noted a lack of specific diagnostic, monitoring, and prognosis (especially cardiac) tools in FD. The composite measurement concept was developed to capture the signs and symptoms most important to people living with FD, alongside heart-rate variability, electrocardiograms, blood pressure, and quality of life as relevant measures within the cardiac domain that can be staged in a progression model with clear group boundaries.
conclusionsBased on work completed to date, developing a composite measurement concept that utilizes digital tools to improve the measurement of cardiac function in FD is conceptually possible and aligns with the evidentiary framework for designing and building a monitoring biomarker. This composite measurement concept could be used for future analytical validation, usability, and clinical validation, seeking to capture progressing cardiac dysfunction in people living with FD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.